• nickiam2@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    One is a truck made for actual work and the other is an abomination pretending to be a truck.

    • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      11 months ago

      The second is basically a minivan, but the 3rd row is a truck bed.

      My truck is kinda similar, but they just took a smaller suv and added a bed.

      • nickiam2@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        So why not just use the van? At least the cargo space is covered from the elements. Most people who drove these yank tanks don’t actually need the truck part.

        • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          So why not just use the van?

          Using the right tool for the right job.

          Open bed of a truck is very handy for very tall items or stuff that needs to be dumped like rocks, dirt etc… Or if your towing a very large load with goose neck trailer.

      • inverted_deflector@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Actually minivans have more utility cause you could take out the middle row. And they had the sliding door and hatch and were more compact .

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    But only one can crush a toddler without you even feeling it.

    Buy the new Ford Infanticide 5000. You’re American. You deserve it.

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Also, one of these actually needs and uses the bed, the other one doesn’t.

  • mutch@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    Towing capacity, payload weight, carrying 3 more people, bed width, drivetrain? I think many trucks are way too big, and it’s silly to own a big work truck if you just use it to go to the grocery store but it’s really about so much more than bed size.

    • jimbo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Let’s be honest, most people with trucks that large rarely have passengers, rarely even approach the payload for the bed, and they never tow anything.

      • mutch@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah sure but I guess my point was that it’s a false equivalency. The truck on the right is massively more capable than the one on the left. I certainly don’t need one that big and most people don’t.

    • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah it’s about

      BIG TRUCK MAKE ME FEEL LIKE MAN. MAKE ME FEEL LIKE BIG BOY. LOOK ME DRIVE BIG VEHICLE SO YOU KNOW I’M IMPORTANT.

      LOOK AT ME!!!

      • cannache@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Legit I know guys that don’t even need one for work or anything, just get one for ego

      • mutch@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Maybe sometimes, but it’s also just a massively more capable vehicle. Sometimes the simplest answer is the truth.

        • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s really not.

          It’s about getting past emission standards and pandering to people who don’t understand enough is enough.

          They’re also hazards as the increased hood length and height create massive blind spots that have caused a rise in collisions and deaths.

          • mutch@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I think both are true. The truck on the right is super capable, and also dangerous, inefficient, unnecessary for most people.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      carrying 3 more people

      As a payload.

      I’m not sure if you can fill it to load capacity even with lead bricks.

      Or if you want to carry people, you can use this: . For carrying not people you can remove seats. It’s even roughly same size.

        • uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Bless your city. I know one city in Belgorod Oblast that still 100% microbuses.

      • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        But a van and a truck are used for different things. Your not going to see a van around the farm for example because it just isn’t that useful for farm work. Just like your not going to see a truck out delivering packages because it just isn’t the useful for that use case. Many of these vehicles have the exact same frame and engion just with a different body on top for whatever best fits the use case.

      • mutch@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        In addition to the payload. Payload goes in the back! Fill it with stones then put five men in it to shovel the stones. You’d need two vans for the same purpose. And if it’s roughly the same size, what’s the problem? Vans like that can be nice too, we see lots of Ford transits here in the states for tradesmen. Similar use case to what you’re describing.

    • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      This was my take. Considering the bed is wider and deeper, that black truck can literally hold 4x what the other truck carries.

      Also from a quick google, I only see a single mini-truck retailer within 500 miles of me and they only sell very-used, with worse exhausts and MPGs than an F150.

      Most people don’t need that bigger truck, but if they do that smaller truck won’t cut it.

    • Ozone63@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      11 months ago

      Lol 100%. Per usual, this is a dumb fucking post from the Cars R Bad people.

      Instead of making points about mass transit and infrastructure, they make arguments like this.

      The result is everyone thinks you’re fucking retarded.

  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    11 months ago

    When my little 4-cylinder truck wore out in 2021, I looked so hard for one of the little kei trucks. But all of the ones I could find were $20k, or they were $15k and needed a lot of work to be driveable. And none of them were within 200 miles of my location.

    I ended up with a used base-model F150 which only cost me $12k. It had 81k miles on it. As near as I can figure out, it started life as a rental truck for a hardware store called “Menards”. It has an 8ft bed, no carpet, no power locks, no power windows, no back seat, no touchscreen, and no color LCD screen in the gauge cluster. I use this truck for a small farm that my wife and I run, so it doesn’t get driven every day.

    Im still looking for a kei truck, though.

    • tty5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Try carused.jp - they’ll find you a truck matching your requirements, arrange shipping and even customs.

      I recommend Suzuki Carry da52t 4x4 - you should be able to get a low mileage one for 5-6k all in.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        The Suzuki Carry is the one I really wanted. I’ve a soft spot for tiny suzuki vehicles.

        Every time I mention not being able to find one in early 2022, people come along to show me where I can get one now. The issue was, I couldn’t find one when I needed it.

        • tty5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          If you still want one as indicated in the comment I responded to contact carused with what you want and they’ll notify you when it’s available

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        It was half the price of the next cheapest truck on the lot, and the next cheapest truck had twice the miles. But the next cheapest truck had all the whiz-bang fancy electronics, instead of being four wheels and a truck bed.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      the larger one does do more:

      • Pick up 3 extra people
      • Can roll down the back window to let long planks of wood through

      These are the only extra advantages I can see, and they are seldom use cases at best.

      Fine, if you’re a contractor driving your workers to/from work whilst carrying all the equipment, on a daily basis, such a truck is very useful.

      But how many people who drive these do that?

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        • Pick up 20 extra people
        • Or pick up 30 extra people if some of them can stay
        • Have enclosed trunk(you still can leave doors in the back open)
        • Lower bed
        • Can carry bigger payloads
      • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        The 3 extra people is a valid reason to not want the smaller truck. Still wouldn’t need to be so monstrous.

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    willing to bet the driver of the tiny truck has a bigger… ahem

    • seathru@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Death wish? I love kei trucks but I fear getting into a mash up in one of them.

        • seathru@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Exactly. Death wish is inversely proportional to vehicle size.

      • catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Better to get the one that’s specifically designed to kill toddlers then. If children have to die so you can be less scared of a “mash up” then it’s all worth it.

        • seathru@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          specifically designed to kill toddlers

          “Lead designer to ensure child lethality” is such a badass job title.

      • Duży Szef [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        American 🫵😐

        Typical “Everyone drives a big truck so I will too!” mindset that misses the core issue on why kei trucks are the better ones. You simply can’t imagine a world where the Ford Death Cruiser 4 billion doesn’t exist.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Japan, the country that invented kei cars, also has larger cars. You’re not looking at the same chance as running into a hummer, but crashing a kei car into a white plate out here still doesn’t look good for the kei.

          In kei trucks and other models where the engine is behind you, a crash is gonna fuck you up, no matter what country you’re in or what you hit.

            • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Sure, but they’re not banned from highways. It’s not uncommon to see them, although you’re right about lower speed limits-- a lot of highways are about 80 km max

        • seathru@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          2 wheels for me please.

          But, thank you for taking the time on that well thought out, informative post.

  • Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    If I want to get a small truck or something similar what can you recommend that’s available in North America? (Serious)

    • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ones readily available include but are not limited to: Ford Maverick (getting great reviews), Toyota Tacoma, Ford Ranger.

      Tbh I wouldn’t mess with much of anything else because they tend to be of questionable quality and/or look stupid.

      • Mishmash2000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yikes?! A Ford RANGER is considered a small truck to you?? They’re part of the growing plague of stupidly large trucks in my part of the world!? :-/ I mean I knew the US had big trucks but I never thought the Ranger would be considered the small alternative?! We’re so screwed?! :-(

        • sibannac@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I saw a 90s ranger next to a new one and the new ranger looks like the size of a 90s f150.

          • Mishmash2000@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s so shocking?! I’m looking at a Ranger out in the car park right now and trying to imagine something bigger parked out there?! It wouldn’t fit within the bounds of the parking space?! Already if there were two Rangers parked next to each other there wouldn’t be enough room to walk between them, even if you turned side on :-/ Let alone having room to be able to open the door and get in & out?!

            In fact I can see that it’s had a flow on effect whereby every other parked car has had to park on the extreme edge of their space to allow room to open the door and get out. If there was one more Ranger anywhere along the line someone would be likely blocked from getting in or out of their car!

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yea all thes suggestions are huge compared to an s10 or ranger or other light truck up til the late 2000s. I hate it so much.

        • dankm@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          The Ranger in the 80s and 90s was a perfectly reasonable size. The new ones are gigantic next to them, but they’re still smaller than almost anything available in the North American market.

        • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          It is one of the smallest available in US. Of course I’m referring to Tacoma with a standard cab, not the People Hauler 5000 it’s basically a minivan crew cab configuration.

          The Tacoma would actually be my pickup of choice. I hate the modern styling, but the Toyota build is just so solid & Ford as of late has been disappointing. To say the least. The green movement is not only based on size, but how durable a product is & if it can last for many, many years of reliable operation. Unfortunately we do not have Hilux, but Tacoma is America’s version of Hilux.

            • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Now this is just personal taste, but I really don’t like the looks of that truck. Cosmetically, I put it on the same level as the Chevy Colorado. Generally speaking, Hyundai isn’t known for quality builds like Toyota, not even close.

              That said: the new Hyundai Elantra makes the short list of vehicles I’d be interested in, buying new. Scotty Kilmer praises its naturally aspirated, non-turbo engine & traditional build components. Thinks it could last a long time. 👍🏻

        • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I love it so far, especially now that I got a bed extender so I can haul full sheets of plywood and such.

          It’s got a ton of power under the hood. I average around 26/30mpg, but my wife averages 28/32-35mpg

          It’s really roomy inside too. I’m 6’3 and this is the first vehicle I’ve driven where I didn’t have to move the seat all the way back. And people are able to sit comfortably behind me.

          I highly recommend trying to get one with the tourneau cover on the bed, because it’s amazing. But don’t get the trailer hitch from them. You can save $3-400 having a local mechanic do it.

          My only real gripes are that the AC blows too hard on its lowest setting (for me) if just the upper vents are blowing. The ride is also pretty smooth, so I often catch myself speeding without realizing it. Also that the steering wheel controls don’t have a play/pause button.

    • rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’d skip the Santa Cruz largely since Hyundai/Kia are experts at cost-cutting that blows up big in customer faces down the line. (anti-theft, engines, warranty work, wiring, etc.) but your options are already limited so I wouldn’t blame you for getting it. I’d get the base engine/transmission though if you anticipate stop/go traffic or off-road use since the dual-clutch in the upper engine option is better than dry clutch models but IMHO still suspect.

      I would lean towards the Maverick but neither are really “small” since they’re still pretty long.

      There’s the Transit Connect if you want a cargo van that’s compact.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      New? Hyundai santa cruz is probably your best bet.

      If you are okay with older/used vehicles i would look for a japan import garage/dealership

      (Im in canada but have seen many of these types of places across the country that import those small trucks)

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    No clue why people buy kei cars from Japan when they can pick up the left hand drive version of the kei cars from Taiwan.

  • zhunk@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t get where all the chunkiness came from. Even ignoring the bed length and width, what is all that extra height doing?

    • odelik@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      11 months ago

      EPA regulations that car manufacturers used as a way to game the system by not focusing on ICE efficency, hybridization, transitioning to electric sooner.

      This is the same reason sedans have gotten larger or disappeared in favor of “cross-overs”.