• NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Hollywood is almost psychotically convinced that this is true, even though 9/10 times a new star turns out to be someone’s kid. Even the old actors we love are mostly someone’s kid.

    • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      There is a known phenomena among the wealthy where they vastly over rate their classes accomplishments relative to others. So rich kid paints a picture and it should be in a gallery. Poor kid wins an art scholarship and it’s due to affirmative action.

    • Donkter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      For the slightest bit of defence: it makes sense. “Nepo baby” generally refers to some kid who doesn’t have the qualifications for their role but got it through their parents giving them an unfair chance.

      But it makes perfect sense that if you grow up in a house with actors and writers for parents they can both teach you about the business, they’ll be happy to pay for that kind of education, and they’ll be super encouraging because unlike most families, to them becoming an actor or director is a perfectly reasonable goal.

      It’s like a child of doctors growing up to become a doctor. On one hand their parents could have just pulled some strings, on the other hand, having parents excited to teach you organic chemistry and advanced math in middle school probably helps you a lot when it comes to qualifying for med school.

      I don’t think all Hollywood nepo babies are like this. I’m just saying you would expect to see children of great actors become actors themselves.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 minutes ago

          Yes but the modern colloquialism of nepotism applies an undeserving attribute to the subject. At least, this is how I’ve noticed it used.

          Edit: oops neoptism

      • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        But all of that training and extra support is exactly what that term is referring to. They wouldn’t have gotten that support unless they were born into it. The people aren’t as giving with their time to just any kid who wants to study their craft. Maybe some do. We need more of that.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        It’s like a child of doctors growing up to become a doctor.

        Except these aren’t remotely the same scenarios, because it simply doesn’t happen as often in any other industry. If anything, the 9/10 number is LOW for entertainment.

        • thallamabond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s a terrible comparison.

          Nobody’s going to give the child of a talented surgeon the chance to do surgery on themselves.

          But they might give the child of a talented actor a role in a film, this is a situation of connections not nurture.

          Example: After Earth (2013)