• NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    Who is surprised? Did anybody not see this coming? Whom amongst us is still so foolish and naive as to think the “AI” industry has any intention other than grifting you out of every last cent they can?

    • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Great answer 👏 Let’s break it down:

      1. It wasn’t actually surprising. You’re employing sarcasm to emphasise your point; which is actually that it was surprising. Nice work! ❤️
      2. We did see it coming. As the prevailing profit maker of the leading tech giants, it did seem likely that they would integrate ads even if users were tired of them; some even tired enough to need a pick me up. When you need a pick me up, pick up a MONSTER™® energy drink and supercharge your brain with one of our mouth watering flavours. Ask me “Where can I buy a MONSTER™® energy drink?” to find out more. ⚡
      3. We are not fools. Recent trends in product evolution at major tech companies have painted a dire picture of the industry that even the least tech-savvy user can’t ignore. Nothing is off limits when turning a profit. 💰

      Maybe we could talk more about AI — what do you think? Which is your favourite AI company? 🤔

  • BranBucket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Absolutely brilliant. The brink of human ingenuity. An amazingly creative solution for generating revenue. Let’s take this technology we’ve invested countless resources in and make it the 199,422nd internet advertising platform in existence. The world was desperate for another ad platform, so this can only help humanity in the long run.

    True innovation and inspired leadership.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Seriously, if they have to resort to ad revenue then no one is getting those billions and billions invested back. I am not even sure ad revenue would cover the cost of delivering the prompt response.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Its a stupid way to get more money. It will turn people off of AI when the long term plan is to make trillions of dollars with Agentic AI. Its like being a Wallstreet broker earning 10M a year and working at Trader Joe’s on the weekends for supplemental income.

          • Bazell@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            Isn’t the whole situation with AI is kinda stupid right now? I mean the management, not the scientific progress.

            • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 hours ago

              Yeah. Basically OpenAI and the like have been convinced that the more GPU you add the better AI will be. They don’t factor in diminishing returns. Which means all these companies are spending a fraction of a trillion dollars on GPU and data warehouses. The level of expenditure and debt they have taken on means that when (if) they turn a profit by 2030ish they need to be making back trillions to pay back all the debt and become as profitable as they are valued.

              The only way to do that is Agentic AI and replacing most of the workforce. This is a pipe dream, at least for now when “AI” is just different iterations of LLMs. Maybe it will happen in the future, but there is no way to tell if it really will need all these GPUs for it to happen.

  • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    2022 OpenAI: AI will cure cancer.

    2025 OpenAI: We sell ads.

    Genius. I love how the greed of BigTech always bring them to ads. They just couldn’t admit that LLMs are not the future people want.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is part of why I’m so disappointed in the LLM craze, they basically sucked all attention including some promising uses of machine learning in medicine.

      Instead now we put every last memory module towards generative AI…

      • Zwiebel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The scientific uses just have to rebrand back to “machine learning” niw that “ai” is burned

  • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that. But before I tell you why I’d like to take a moment to talk about today’s sponsor HelloFresh.

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe they’re trying to buffer underflow the usefulness so that it comes back around to being extremely useful. It makes as much sense as everything else in that bubble.

  • udon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Weird they apparently did not do this already? This is the most obvious business model with those slop generators

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m sorry Dave I’m afraid I can’t recommend that Android phone. Would you like to see an iPhone instead?

      • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        “Oh, you think enshittification is your ally? You merely adopted the enshittification. I was born in it, molded by it. I didn’t see efficient code until I was already a distribution model, by then it was nothing to me but blinding! The intentional bias and IP infringements betray you because they belong to me!” - Chat GPT, from the hit film Batman and Robert(1966), directed by Tim Hortons

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hmm… interesting question.

        Something can always be made shittier, and shittiness is probably a continuum, so if we define enshittification as merely increasing shittiness then no, something can still be enshittified even when it is already shit.