cyrano@piefed.social to Electric Vehicles@slrpnk.netEnglish · 17 hours agoTesla’s 4680 battery supply chain collapses as partner writes down deal by 99%electrek.coexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up181arrow-down12 cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up179arrow-down1external-linkTesla’s 4680 battery supply chain collapses as partner writes down deal by 99%electrek.cocyrano@piefed.social to Electric Vehicles@slrpnk.netEnglish · 17 hours agomessage-square8fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squaredave@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21arrow-down1·15 hours agoHow is $2.9bn to $7k a 99% cut? It’s far closer to a 100% cut…
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·10 hours agoBecause $7386 is a lot more than $0.
minus-squaredave@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 hours agoA 99% reduction from $2.9 billion is $29 million. On the scale from $0 to $29 million, $7,386 is much closer to $0, so it’s more accurate to say the deal was cut by 100% unless you want to quote it with several decimal places. It’s 99.9997% to 4 places.
How is $2.9bn to $7k a 99% cut? It’s far closer to a 100% cut…
Because $7386 is a lot more than $0.
And a lot less than $29,000,000.
…huh? That would be 0%
A 99% reduction from $2.9 billion is $29 million. On the scale from $0 to $29 million, $7,386 is much closer to $0, so it’s more accurate to say the deal was cut by 100% unless you want to quote it with several decimal places.
It’s 99.9997% to 4 places.
It’s 99.99%, repeating, of course…