• pimento64@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    GrapheneOS’s objections are irrelevant because you should be using security extensions if you’re old enough to get online without parental supervision. JavaScript has not run on my web browser since Bush Jr was in office. Considering Graphene is made by weirdos who get hysterical if you start asking questions about the difference between admin permissions on a big device that lives on your desk versus a small device that lives in your pocket, they’re pretty firmly relegated to being unserious.

    • Xylight‮@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      you should be using security extensions

      Do you really think extensions are sufficient to manage proper process isolation in the browser engine itself?

      JavaScript has not run on my web browser since Bush Jr was in office

      Are we serious? You can’t claim that security is irrelevant for everyone because you cripple your web browser to be functionally equivalent to curl https://website.com/.

      made by weirdos who get hysterical if you start asking questions about the difference between admin permissions…

      There’s little difference. I’m pretty sure they’d agree the traditional desktop security model (especially Linux) is extremely weak.

    • pr0sp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Omg this idiot saying no one should use javascript… This is un realistic unpractical and stupid.