Why are people here saying that “Blizzards” are “Milkshakes”?!
It’s breaking my brain.
Blizzards aren’t MILKSHAKES. They’re soft-serve icecream in a cup. ICE CREAM is not the same thing as a MILKSHAKE.
You don’t drink a blizzard. You eat it with a spoon. You don’t put two straws in and share it with your sweet-heart down at the old malt-shop. It’s not a drink!
Sorry. Don’t know why this discussion about Blizzard vs Milkshake has triggered me. It’s a new discovery about my personality that I’m not proud of…
Depends on the state, apparently. There’s no codified federal definition for what constitutes a “milkshake”. As opposed to something like ice cream which is very much codified at a federal level.
I posted a link further down, but apparently national chains do this is to avoid dealing with state regulations. “Its not a milkshake, its a Blizzard!”
No might about it, in the US, definitionally, a milkshake is ice cream blended with milk at minimum. It can optionally have mixins or syrups blended in as well, but if there’s no milk (or milk alternative)*, it ain’t a milkshake
The definition has changed throughout the years, hopefully we can all at least agree on that. Some early “shakes” had no milk whatsoever! I didn’t know this either, but apparently the US has no legal definition of what constitutes a milkshake, leaving it up to the individual states to decide.
I also found this little snippet particularly interesting for this conversation:
As an ice cream drink, the 20th-century milkshake’s only serious contenders have been its legions of imitators. United States federal code defines ice cream down to the amount of air it may contain, but is silent on milkshakes, leaving their parameters to states. For restaurants with regional or national reach, the simplest way to sidestep dozens of states’ conflicting milkshake definitions within their territories is not to sell milkshakes. Many, instead, offer “shakes” or milkshake-adjacent frozen dessert drinks with branded names that suggest creamy coldness, but avoid the legal entanglements of calling them “milkshakes.”
This is why you end up with Blizzards and Frosties apparently!
It’s technically not “ice cream” either. Enough of the cream (and fat) is removed that it’s officially labelled “ice milk”, at least in my dairy-centric jurisdiction.
Why are people here saying that “Blizzards” are “Milkshakes”?!
It’s breaking my brain.
Blizzards aren’t MILKSHAKES. They’re soft-serve icecream in a cup. ICE CREAM is not the same thing as a MILKSHAKE.
You don’t drink a blizzard. You eat it with a spoon. You don’t put two straws in and share it with your sweet-heart down at the old malt-shop. It’s not a drink!
Sorry. Don’t know why this discussion about Blizzard vs Milkshake has triggered me. It’s a new discovery about my personality that I’m not proud of…
Actually, everything is salad.
I feel like I just went on a roller coaster ride of emotion reading this lol.
Same as Frostys at Wendy’s. They’re not as thick as a Blizzard, but you don’t drink them. People would still ask for straws, though.
I guess they’re free to suck till their brains fall out though
I always let both melt a bit so it can be drank through a straw 🤷♂️
I would say a frosty is more of a milkshake than a blizzard and I would still argue with some one who says a frosty is a milkshake.
Blended ice cream is a milkshake in the USA. I didn’t know it was weird until I ordered a milkshake in Australia.
A milkshake has milk in it too in the US, wher’ve you been gettin your milkshakes?
Depends on the state, apparently. There’s no codified federal definition for what constitutes a “milkshake”. As opposed to something like ice cream which is very much codified at a federal level.
I posted a link further down, but apparently national chains do this is to avoid dealing with state regulations. “Its not a milkshake, its a Blizzard!”
Might have some milk, but when I went overseas a milk shake was literally milk with crushed ice blended intop a drink.
No might about it, in the US, definitionally, a milkshake is ice cream blended with milk at minimum. It can optionally have mixins or syrups blended in as well, but if there’s no milk (or milk alternative)*, it ain’t a milkshake
The definition has changed throughout the years, hopefully we can all at least agree on that. Some early “shakes” had no milk whatsoever! I didn’t know this either, but apparently the US has no legal definition of what constitutes a milkshake, leaving it up to the individual states to decide.
I also found this little snippet particularly interesting for this conversation:
This is why you end up with Blizzards and Frosties apparently!
https://imbibemagazine.com/american-milkshake-history/
So my usual Blizzard is a Reese’s Peanut Butter Cup shake?
They don’t add milk or milk substitute to blizzards. Blizzards are not shakes.
I thought that was a thickshake
No that’s yo mama
It’s technically not “ice cream” either. Enough of the cream (and fat) is removed that it’s officially labelled “ice milk”, at least in my dairy-centric jurisdiction.
At Krusty Burger milkshakes are called “non-dairy partially gelatinated gum-based beverages”
This is my favorite response in the entire thread so far.
If you wait long enough, it’s a drink. Don’t tell me what to do.