Of the total area that is used by humans (Agriculture, Urban and Built-up Land),

  • urban and built-up land is 1m km²,
  • agriculture is 48m km²,

so agriculture is 48 of 49 millions km² used, that’s 98%. The remaining 2% are all streets and housing and other infrastructure together.

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s like engaging with a bad-faith hydra - one of these is literally just a single word reply. If you can’t even make your nonsense feasible to engage with why should I extend you the courtesy of treating you as anything other than the poor troll you’re behaving like?

    You’ve misunderstood my initial claims and/or the data, which are both abundantly clear - and on top of that you’ve spent this whole time acting like a jerk. I’m not going to reward this behavior.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      this is just posturing and accusations. your evidence doesn’t sufficiently support the claim you e made, and now you’re making excuses not to present sufficient evidence. I strongly suspect you don’t have it.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Lmfao I already provided evidence that 1:1 matches exactly what I said (because I based my initial claims off it), quit yer bullshit.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It doesn’t make it false, either. That’s the nice thing about truth, it doesn’t care what you think about it, it’s just self-evident. Good grief you’re really not very good at this.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              anyone can read what you claimed, evaluate the supposed evidence you provided, and see it does not support your claim.

              • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Well no, they can read the evidence and then draw their own conclusions. I’m not so arrogant as to try and speak for them, a moral burden you appear delightfully unencumbered by.

                • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  anyone who believes what you’ve presented supports your claim does not understand the claim or the evidence or both.

                  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 hours ago

                    So now you’re not only trying to speak for them, you’re implying they’re stupid? Bold move there buddy.