• moitoi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I agree. It looks me time to know how mastodon works. But, it’s how it maintain the quality. You can’t have quality and quantity in a social media.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I actually disagree with that. It’s theoretically possible to have quality and quantity at the same time. But to do so, it can’t be based on an engagement algorithm, because engagement typically correlates with low quality posts.

      This is why you’ll never see quality and quantity together from a profit-seeking platform - they are incentivized to shovel you low quality stuff that’s highly engaging.

      • moitoi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Algorithms doesn’t change much. Back in the days when we used mostly forums, and chats, and… all without algorithms, we had the same trend with quality and quantity. The quality went lower with the number of people using them. The small niche forum maintained the quality and for some are still up. The biggest quickly shrink.

        The same applied to the first social media and the newer.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          An algorithm that prioritizes quality (instead of engagement) DOES change it though. Let’s not pretend that all algorithms are the same.

          • Lemdee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Let’s not pretend that all algorithms are the same.

            But if we don’t, how can we act superior to people who use algorithm based platforms? /s