Hey, Haui
You’ve blocked me, so I doubt you’re gonna read this
Anyways, I’m sorry for attacking you like this, it’s just that I’m often hypervigilant about newcomers in leftist spaces who come off as patsoc-adjacent because patsocs often wreck leftist spaces and I didn’t want Lemmygrad to follow the same path. I hope you understand and will try to be better rather than merely be reactionist in the future.
~TFP

  • Horse {they/them}@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
    152·
    9 days ago

    I feel, Haui is rightly trying to grapple the contradictions of how to grow mass movements amongst these reactionary masses and what concessions - that’s right concessions- does a western vanguard of scientific socialists have to consider while doing its best to avoid tailism.

    giving “concessions” to these reactionaries means throwing at least one minority group under the bus

    • darkernations@lemmygrad.ml
      82·
      9 days ago

      giving “concessions” to these reactionaries means throwing at least one minority under the bus

      Chances are that I will be included in that minority. I think concession here is not tailism but rather here is a common ground we can work on and the stuff we disagree on we as socialists will not resort to tailism.

      Also when I mean reactionaries I don’t just mean social conservatives. I also mean the socdems and socdem apologists such as the Mamdanis and Corbyns of this world.

      • Horse {they/them}@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
        152·
        9 days ago

        i am not willing to entertain sacrificing an oppressed group to gain fickle and reactionary allies and am deeply suspicious of those that are

        • darkernations@lemmygrad.ml
          72·
          9 days ago

          i am not willing to entertain sacrificing an oppressed group to gain fickle and reactionary allies and am deeply suspicious of those that are

          Cool. Let’s cut to the chase: who did I say we should throw under the bus?

          • Horse {they/them}@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
            10·
            9 days ago

            when i replied to your comment it only contained “Chances are that I will be included in that minority” which combined with your first comment i took to mean that you were at least ambivalent to the idea

            • darkernations@lemmygrad.ml
              72·
              9 days ago

              when i replied to your comment it only contained “Chances are that I will be included in that minority” which combined with your first comment i took to mean that you were at least ambivalent to the idea

              Fair enough.