Hey, Haui
You’ve blocked me, so I doubt you’re gonna read this
Anyways, I’m sorry for attacking you like this, it’s just that I’m often hypervigilant about newcomers in leftist spaces who come off as patsoc-adjacent because patsocs often wreck leftist spaces and I didn’t want Lemmygrad to follow the same path. I hope you understand and will try to be better rather than merely be reactionist in the future.
~TFP

  • darkernations@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    giving “concessions” to these reactionaries means throwing at least one minority under the bus

    Chances are that I will be included in that minority. I think concession here is not tailism but rather here is a common ground we can work on and the stuff we disagree on we as socialists will not resort to tailism.

    Also when I mean reactionaries I don’t just mean social conservatives. I also mean the socdems and socdem apologists such as the Mamdanis and Corbyns of this world.

    • Horse {they/them}@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      i am not willing to entertain sacrificing an oppressed group to gain fickle and reactionary allies and am deeply suspicious of those that are

      • darkernations@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        i am not willing to entertain sacrificing an oppressed group to gain fickle and reactionary allies and am deeply suspicious of those that are

        Cool. Let’s cut to the chase: who did I say we should throw under the bus?

        • Horse {they/them}@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 days ago

          when i replied to your comment it only contained “Chances are that I will be included in that minority” which combined with your first comment i took to mean that you were at least ambivalent to the idea

          • darkernations@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            when i replied to your comment it only contained “Chances are that I will be included in that minority” which combined with your first comment i took to mean that you were at least ambivalent to the idea

            Fair enough.