• muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    They said they it’s a Citrix thing. They are getting rid of Citrix too, which is fine as it’s a pain in the ass, but moving to full PCs for remote workers tha don’t need them is a ridiculous waste of time and money, especially now. It’s just going to make things worse because supporting that won’t scale as cleanly.

    And why this migration? It’s not like Citrix was a bad idea on the first place. It actually solves some real problems for us.

    IT: “because we can’t remote into a Citrix box.” Me: “the fuck you cant.”

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      because we can’t remote into a Citrix box

      Citrix literally makes a tool for doing exactly that! Its called Citrix Director and while yes it’s just as slightly-not-quite-wonky as everything else Citrix, it works quite well for remoting into a thin client’s session among other management features

      They said they it’s a Citrix thing.

      Pretty sure it’s more of a redirected folder thing with Windows, but Windows has been pretty wonky recently about redirected folders and profiles. By memory of my last Citrix environment redirecting the recycle bin is completely possible but bad practice since it’s just more profile data to fling around and slow down login times