• Tedesche@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Imagine being the CEO who approved a lawsuit against a government that is trying to protect children being subjected to the very documented harms of social media for profit. Imagine that.

    I think we need a diagnosis for societally acquired psychopathy.

    • Quilotoa@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Are there that many under 16 Redditors that it would make a big financial impact?

    • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This idiotic law should be challenged. “Protecting children” is an tired excuse used to justify limiting people’s freedom and invading their privacy.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Broken clock. This law should be challenged. While there’s a sour irony in Reddit being the ones to do it, this is actually the right move for Reddit to be making.

      • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It should be challenged by Australians. An American oligarchic organziation by definition shouldn’t be able to have any influence on national policies. If the Americans ever clean up their act, which is unlikely, then one should at least consider whether they should be allowed to file such challenges.

    • TheWeirdestCunt@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That’s not what it does though. If it was actually about protecting children they wouldn’t have allowed kids to access Roblox, the company who’s CEO says pedos are good for business