Work is underway to dry hundreds of books and other items that got wet when a pipe burst in one of the library rooms in the Louvre's Egyptian antiquities department.
Hundreds of works were damaged at the Louvre in Paris when a pipe burst because of flooding, the museum’s deputy general administrator said.
The flooding led to a burst pipe and affected one of the three rooms of the library in the Egyptian antiquities department, he said.
Above are paragraphs 1 and 3 from the referenced article.
A simple but logical reading of both states that “a flood occurred (first), and the flood is what caused the pipe to burst (second)”. Extremely disappointed in this level of journalistic competence.
I don’t think it’s AI. It looks like bad human writing. An AI wouldn’t use clunky non-idiomatic phrases like this:
He noted that the area of the pipe break is part of museum spaces that will undergo a major renovation…
Also, A LLM would be unlikely to say a flood led to a burst pipe when it has lots of examples of writing where the causation is the other way round. A human having a brain fart might make that mistake though.
I suspect this article was written in a hurry by someone whose English isn’t great.
Good gravy! I was giving NBC at least a little credit for trying to do mediocre journalism.
I know English is not everyone’s first (or even second) language, but if your job is writing for a living in English at least get some help.
P.S. I only know one language myself and couldn’t read/write/speak/understand any other to save my soul, so I think people that can are really gifted. It’s just that NBC obviously didn’t care about this article in the least.
There is at least one thing they could do (not saying it would help the workers, but they could do it):
Fire any remaining people then take that money and run! /s
NBC’s AI can’t write worth a hoot:
Above are paragraphs 1 and 3 from the referenced article.
A simple but logical reading of both states that “a flood occurred (first), and the flood is what caused the pipe to burst (second)”. Extremely disappointed in this level of journalistic competence.
I don’t think it’s AI. It looks like bad human writing. An AI wouldn’t use clunky non-idiomatic phrases like this:
Also, A LLM would be unlikely to say a flood led to a burst pipe when it has lots of examples of writing where the causation is the other way round. A human having a brain fart might make that mistake though.
I suspect this article was written in a hurry by someone whose English isn’t great.
Good gravy! I was giving NBC at least a little credit for trying to do mediocre journalism.
I know English is not everyone’s first (or even second) language, but if your job is writing for a living in English at least get some help.
P.S. I only know one language myself and couldn’t read/write/speak/understand any other to save my soul, so I think people that can are really gifted. It’s just that NBC obviously didn’t care about this article in the least.
Journalist could also not know how to write, but the editor should very much know how to read and not let these kinds of things pass.
How about paying a living wage for human writers who actually give a damn about the integrity of the end product?
There is at least one thing they could do (not saying it would help the workers, but they could do it): Fire any remaining people then take that money and run! /s
Dang it, now that you gave them the idea, they seem to have already done it, retroactively. I hope you are happy /s (😭).