What I don’t get is why it took them decades to figure this out. Why have they been giving us sugar substitutes without understanding what they have been doing to us? Why were these approved for use in the first place?

  • gustofwind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Ingesting chemicals created by known bad actors in the food and chemical industry for the purpose of having those same bad actors sell you unlimited addictive sweets…

    I mean come on

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      13 hours ago

      WTF are you on about? Sorbitol is a sugar alcohol that is found naturally in fruit, AFAIK all research until now has shown sorbitol to be less harmful than sugar, especially to your teeth. Sorbitol is generally made from starch while normal sugar is a refined product.

      What about this makes Sorbitol obviously harmful?
      Seems like you are making a giant argument from ignorance.

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      If your entire argument is “food industry bad”, that’s not very convincing. Do you somehow produce everything you eat yourself? Do you make your own clothes too, from resources you collected yourself? Did you collect the resources to make the device you post on yourself and put them together?

      • gustofwind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I do my best to purchase the most sustainable and quality versions of any given offering I can. I’ll also readily acknowledge the harms and where we do and don’t have choices

        But I’m not sure how you jumped from the notion that the industries behind artificial sweeteners, who we already know are verifiably bad and overtly acting against the interests of public health to… you didn’t make your own clothes so artificial sweeteners are actually safe and awesome 🤪

        • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Like the other dude said, if your only argument is “OMG, everybody knows that corporations are evil, they must be selling poison”, that doesn’t rise to the level of obvious.

          It’s like saying that since the US federal government in the 60s was racist and transphobic, they must have faked the moon landing.

          If it were “obvious” that a sugar substitute was dangerous, the sugar companies would have trumpeted that as loudly as they could.

        • Lumidaub@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I never said artificial sweeteners are safe and awesome, don’t put words in my mouth. What I said was that if your argument is “food industry bad therefore sweeteners bad”, you can’t trust and buy absolutely anything from any industry.

    • Elextra@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      For me, I think there could be room for scientific advancement. I mean look at all we have today that we wouldn’t think possible decades ago. And people are still finding new foods. Food scientists are a thing. While there are bad actors out there sometimes if its really cool and really good, you can have a new product good for the public and profitable.

      Like the other poster said, I’m no scientist by any means. Its not out of the question for our society to have artificial sweeteners that aren’t bad for us. There’s many out there. Maybe some are bad, maybe some okay for our health.