• tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That’s insane! How do you define a win, if it’s 1 win from a multiverse of losses?

      • gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        They do that you cannot go forwards in time until you resolve all the branches of the past, and that a checkmate on any timeline ends the match

        The goal instead becomes “can I make them so disorientated by the branching paths that they don’t notice I’ve checkmate until it’s too late?” whilst simultaneously keeping track of your own many branches so they don’t do the same to you

        • cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          One of the most difficult bits is defending from future time snipers. You don’t get to move out of the check, so it’s checkmate. It’s not actually hard, just mind bending.

          It’s also weird to have 3 white kings on the same board…

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s not actually too bad. Any checkmate wins the whole game. It just gets weird. The king can flee to another board, or you can checkmate into the past.