• huppakee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    23 hours ago

    these trucks are only used by the few people who need a big truck

    Did I miss your sarcasme or are you not connected to reality?

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      These truck should only be used by the few people who need a big truck. That is a small minority of people.

      • Desdinova@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Right. They should only be used by the few people that need them. But the reality is there are a lot of people with no business owning a big truck driving them in places that big trucks have no business being in

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Back to my point: fix tranit so more people don’t think they need to drive. Small cars are still vastly more dangeious than transit.

          • percent@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I’ve known plenty of people in southern US states who drive trucks for purposes that don’t require trucks. They’ll never choose public transit over their trucks, no matter how good it is.

            …Though, realistically, that’s not exclusively a truck issue. If one can just step outside and get into their own car and be immediately en route to their destination, on my their own schedule/convenience, it’ll be hard to convince them to choose a less convenient mode of transportation.

            • bluGill@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Are you sure they wouldn’t use transit? Or is it just all the transit they have ever seen is so bad they wouldn’t use it and they have no vision of what could be - but if somehow you built they great transit they would use it?

              • percent@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                I’m very confident that they wouldn’t. However, I suppose it’s possible that I’ve never seen transit that could be so good that people would choose it over their own vehicles. What would that look like?

                I suppose a few of them might do it if there’s free coffee on board (or beer, but that would be chaos lol) and it ran on VERY convenient schedules.

                People in the US place a LOT of value in convenience, so the public transit system would have to offer something that outweighs that. Do you know of any examples?

                • bluGill@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Convience is needed. That means it is not more than 5 minutes from when you get to the stop until you are moving. It means you can get to a lot of places in a short time. It doesn’t mean cofiee - bring your own, or stop by a coffee shop and get on the next but/train which isn’t that long of a wait.

                  the above would cost a lot of money - but it is much less than people spend on cars.

                  • percent@infosec.pub
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    Ahh I think I get it now. That might be feasible in a densely populated city. Most of the truck guys I’ve known live in suburban or rural areas. The few who lived in the city center drove much smaller pickup trucks like Toyota Tacomas, Ford Rangers, etc.