• percent@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m very confident that they wouldn’t. However, I suppose it’s possible that I’ve never seen transit that could be so good that people would choose it over their own vehicles. What would that look like?

    I suppose a few of them might do it if there’s free coffee on board (or beer, but that would be chaos lol) and it ran on VERY convenient schedules.

    People in the US place a LOT of value in convenience, so the public transit system would have to offer something that outweighs that. Do you know of any examples?

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Convience is needed. That means it is not more than 5 minutes from when you get to the stop until you are moving. It means you can get to a lot of places in a short time. It doesn’t mean cofiee - bring your own, or stop by a coffee shop and get on the next but/train which isn’t that long of a wait.

      the above would cost a lot of money - but it is much less than people spend on cars.

      • percent@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Ahh I think I get it now. That might be feasible in a densely populated city. Most of the truck guys I’ve known live in suburban or rural areas. The few who lived in the city center drove much smaller pickup trucks like Toyota Tacomas, Ford Rangers, etc.

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 minutes ago

          Suburbs are dense enough to support the above transit levels. A few places is the world have it.

          rural is not, but that is a minority of people.