• watson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This is called a “dark pattern“ (a rather shitty design concept) wherein the design is specifically engineered to make you finally give up because it’s so overly complicated, and to just accept the cookies so they can track you and get all your personal information and sell it.

  • Album@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Have your browser delete all cookies after you close it. It’s easier. You can add exceptions too.

  • Damarus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Little known fact, it’s illegal to hide the option to reject cookies behind multiple clicks.

      • pmk@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        In the EU. It must be as easy to select no as it is to select yes. Afaik, each country has its own agency that you can contact about violations.

    • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I know that but it doesn’t really change anything. I’m not going to sue each and every website because of that

      • Damarus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You don’t have to sue anyone. You can ask the offenders to correct their website and if they don’t, give a notice to the data protection authority in your country and they will handle it from there.

  • Konna@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    At least one tabloid newspaper in Finland (Iltalehti) has put the settings behind a paywall. Accept tracking or pay up.

  • gegil@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I just browse everything in private window by default. Accepting cookies resets them after opening new window.