Mog Spawn@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoDecomposed body in handcuffs, Nazi paraphernalia found in Stamford, Conn. gunman's home, police saywww.cbsnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1157arrow-down12
arrow-up1155arrow-down1external-linkDecomposed body in handcuffs, Nazi paraphernalia found in Stamford, Conn. gunman's home, police saywww.cbsnews.comMog Spawn@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-squaremfed1122@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day agoMaybe I’m wrong, but shouldn’t this grammatically be “Kapitulieren nicht”?
minus-squareKirp123@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up27·1 day agoHe was just a regular nazi not a grammar nazi.
minus-squareanton@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·21 hours agoNot quite, “Kapituliere nicht” would be the correct imperative form, but sounds a bit weak. “Kapitulieren? Nein!” would work, but not without the question mark. No surrender would be “keine Kapitulation”.
minus-squareDiplomjodler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·23 hours agoNo. The closest I can come up with would be “Niemals kapitulieren”.
Maybe I’m wrong, but shouldn’t this grammatically be “Kapitulieren nicht”?
He was just a regular nazi not a grammar nazi.
chef’s kiss
Not quite, “Kapituliere nicht” would be the correct imperative form, but sounds a bit weak. “Kapitulieren? Nein!” would work, but not without the question mark. No surrender would be “keine Kapitulation”.
No. The closest I can come up with would be “Niemals kapitulieren”.