Cars used to be entirely mechanical objects. With hard work and expertise, basically any old vehicle could be restored and operated: On YouTube, you can watch a man drive a 1931 Alvis to McDonald’s. But the car itself was stuck in time. If the automaker added a feature to the following year’s model, you just didn’t get it. Things have changed. My Model 3 has few dials or buttons; nearly every feature is routed through the giant central touch screen. It’s not just Tesla: Many new cars—and especially electric cars—are now stuffed with software, receiving over-the-air updates to fix bugs, tweak performance, or add new functionality.

In other words, your car is a lot like an iPhone (so much so that in the auto industry, describing EVs as “smartphones on wheels” has become a go-to cliché.) This has plenty of advantages—the improved navigation, the fart noises—but it also means that your car may become worse because the software is outdated, not because the parts break. Even top-of-the-line phones are destined to become obsolete—still able to perform the basic functions like phone calls and texts, but stuck with an old operating system and failing apps. The same struggle is now coming for cars.

Software-dependent cars are still new enough that it’s unclear how they will age. “It’s becoming the ethos of the industry that everyone’s promising a continually evolving car, and we don’t yet know how they’re going to pull that off,” Sean Tucker, a senior editor at Kelley Blue Book, told me. “Cars last longer than technology does.” The problem with cars as smartphones on wheels is that these two machines live and die on very different timescales. Many Americans trade in their phone every year and less than 30 percent keep an iPhone for longer than three years, but the average car on the road is nearly 13 years old. (Tesla didn’t respond to a request for comment about how its cars age.)

    • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Because Teslas have dogshit reliability and all have OTA updates, whereas other brands don’t suffer from these issues.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Maybe it’s not enough for them to buy a new car? I mean it’s 6 years old; I’m pretty sure Tesla was the only player in the EV scene back then.

        • Asetru@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I’m pretty sure Tesla was the only player in the EV scene back then.

          Absolutely not.

          I bought a BEV back then. It was a VW Golf. Still driving it. The leaf, eNiro and i3 were contenders for me.

          • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I bought a Model 3 SR+ in 2019 because it was pretty much the only decent option, also still driving it.

            BYD and other Chinese brands were not available here yet and German manufacturers were asleep at the wheel.

            The best coming out of Germany at that time were repurposed chassis from ICE cars, with all the flaws that brings. The Leaf lacked water cooling on the batteries.

            The best alternative at that time was a classic Hyundai Ioniq but it had a 28 kWh battery where as the Model 3 SR+ had a 52 kWh battery for 10.000€ more.

            Since you own an e-Golf, just to put some numbers on this. (e-Golf left, Model 3 SR+ right)

            • Efficiency: 168 Wh/km vs 146 Wh/km
            • Battery: 32 kWh vs 52 kWh
            • Fast charging: 39 kW vs 105 kW (later patched to 170 kW peak)
            • Acceleration: 9.6s vs 5.6s 0-100
            • Weight: 1615 kg vs 1700 kg
            • Price: 32.000€ vs 45.000€
            • Charger network: Whatever ionity was doing vs Superchargers

            https://ev-database.org/car/1087/Volkswagen-e-Golf

            https://ev-database.org/car/1485/Tesla-Model-3-Standard-Range-Plus

            • Asetru@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Well, none of what you say is wrong. It’s just not the point. There were other options besides tesla - and while they were different (e.g. I’m well aware of the small golf battery), they were there.

              You say that for you it was the only decent option. Fine. But not the point. Maybe your usage profile warranted what tesla offered. But “Tesla was the only player in the EV scene back then” is just wrong. That’s all I said.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I have a 2017 Leaf. It absolutely has its drawbacks compared to most modern cars, but it did exist 6 years ago.

        • PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 hours ago

          That’s when I bought mine, and it was either get a Model 3 with ~270 miles of range or a Nissan Leaf or a tiny BMW iQ, both with like 80.

          For the record, if the software updates stopped where they’re at today, I’d be fine with how the car functions until the end of its life. In fact, I kinda wish they’d just leave things alone at this point because I don’t want any extra features out of the thing.

          • MalReynolds@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 hours ago

            For the record, if the software updates stopped where they’re at today, I’d be fine with how the car functions until the end of its life. In fact, I kinda wish they’d just leave things alone at this point because I don’t want any extra features out of the thing.

            And therein lies the rub, you don’t get to choose, the corpo does and you have to trust them (you do trust them, don’t you?). Pretty much like you’re renting, not owning. As the article points out this is similar to phone ‘ownership’, hopefully in the fullness of time there will be a GrapheneOS equivalent for cars…

          • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            There were other options that just weren’t well advertised/known. KIA Niro/Hyundai Kona, Chevy Bolt, and Jaguar I-Pace all existed in 2019 in addition to the 2 you mentioned.

            • PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Oh yeah, I do remember looking at those too, but iirc they were all still at a significant range disadvantage compared to the model 3. Dunno about now, though.