The White House is preparing to issue an executive order as soon as Friday that enlists the power of the federal government to block states from regulating artificial intelligence, according to four people familiar with the matter and a leaked draft of the order obtained by POLITICO.

The draft document, confirmed as authentic by three people familiar with the matter, would launch several efforts to challenge state AI laws — including an “AI Litigation Task Force” run by the Department of Justice.

  • Manjushri@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    1 day ago

    An EO to overrule state legislation? Is that even remotely legal? Can’t the states just tell him to fuck off. The courts aren’t going to throw state law out the window because the president says they are bad laws. It would take an act of Congress to do that and Congress failed in the attempt earlier this year.

    • neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think he can write whatever unenforceable executive orders he wants. Enforcing them could be illegal, which would make them unenforceable executive orders.

      • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s also illegal. It’s a violation of the 10th amendment. Powers not delegated to the federal government and not prohibited to the states are reserved for the states or the people. States have every right to make laws restricting the use of AI within their own borders.

        (I am neither a lawyer nor a constitutional scholar.)

        • ccunning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          But the proposed EO has no power to do anything so it doesn’t really break the 10th.

          (also neither a lawyer nor a constitutional scholar so this is only based on my very basic understanding. Fully prepared to hang my head in shame if someone more informed explains how I’m wrong)

          • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            If he enlists his agencies to, through legal actions, office raids, and city occupation to enforce his “powerless” EO, presumably the 10th starts being meaningful.

        • ccunning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          Wasn’t trying to undercut you or anything - it just as absurd as you’ve said.

          EOs are just the busywork the sycophants have given Trump to keep him happily busy marking up pages with his sharpie.

    • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s illegal. It’s a violation of the 10th amendment. Powers not delegated to the federal government and not prohibited to the states are reserved for the states or the people. States have every right to make laws restricting the use of AI within their own borders.

      (I am neither a lawyer nor a constitutional scholar.)

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    23 hours ago

    These fucks cannot be consistent if their lives depended on it. “StAtEs RiGhTs” unless: fascism. Obvious exception.

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    20 hours ago

    If it sucks ass, makes people’s lives worse, or makes parasites richer, you can damn well expect this so-called government to okay it.

    Fuck

    • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sadly, I think this is the entire reason for this. Anyone with a brain can see that people are buying favors from Trump left and right, and it is to the benefit of every AI-reliant overbloated company (nvidia included) to keep that bubble growing instead of risking a pop.

  • Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    In the end, the technical limitations of AI are going to be the real regulation. As much as the grifters of the world will not admit it, you can’t shove a useless technology down peoples throat at hundreds of billions dollars of expense and expect it to have a financial return for you.

  • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    To watch firsthand, the people who’s jobs it is to protect us, salivate over the idea of feeding us to the wolves while scary, is downright terrifying.