Google: “Based on this feedback and our ongoing conversations with the community, we are building a new advanced flow that allows experienced users to accept the risks of installing software that isn’t verified. We are designing this flow specifically to resist coercion, ensuring that users aren’t tricked into bypassing these safety checks while under pressure from a scammer. It will also include clear warnings to ensure users fully understand the risks involved, but ultimately, it puts the choice in their hands.”

Thank god. I would’ve ditched Android for good if this went through, and while it sounds like it would be annoying for casual users to enable unverified apps, at least we can still install them.

  • MithranArkanere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    56 minutes ago

    No freaking way this was because of “feedback”. This was because the European Commission will keep escalating their fines if Google keeps at it with the monopoly bullshit.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    We are designing this flow specifically to resist coercion, ensuring that users aren’t tricked into bypassing these safety checks while under pressure from a scammer.

    Translation: if they want scamware, it better be from Google Play, where Google gets a 30% cut. On top of the cut they got for the phishing link in Google Ads.

    And if anything thinks I’m being hyperbolic, go on Google Play and search for pretty much anything. Or turn off your adblocker.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Google: "Based on this feedback and our ongoing conversations with the community, we are building a new advanced flow that allows experienced users to accept the risks of installing software that isn’t verified.

    And we will NEVER trust you again because we know you’ll retry this next year or so in a few smaller steps that all have cutesy innocent names that are supposed to lull us in a false sense of security

    Fuck Google, stop paying them for anything, stop using their services wherever possible.

    • poopkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Wait, so Google listened to our feedback, and we’re still mad? What would a positive outcome have looked like?

  • network_switch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s still worse than before. Really need to break mobile away from Google and Apple. Preferably as close to standard Linux as possible

    • tehmics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      AOSP makes a lot more sense to me. We just need to adopt Graphene or Lineage en masse and start contributing to support more devices, grow that out into a real alternative with support for the already existing android app ecosystem, and real alternatives to Google Play services

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Don’t consider this a win, guys, this is more of an ‘Oh shit, we’re screwed if we follow through with this right now’ moment, there’s nothing stopping them from walking this back at a later, less turbulent date when no one’s paying attention, and locking Android down anyways, as this directly reminds me of the situation which caused WEI to be scrapped.

    Also, the EU pushing Chat Control through the back door might embolden Google to both try an Android lockdown just like was going to roll out before, and try WEI again, and get both actually pushed through somehow.

    I wouldn’t even be surprised if MS were emboldened to try to lock down PCs… Again…

    • PaintedSnail@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I mean, sure, but there was never anything stopping them from doing this in the first place except public pressure. Large companies changing tracks due to public demand is a good thing, and definitely a win.

      I think its better to simply realize that a win doesn’t mean the fight is over. It’s okay to be happy about a success. Just don’t let up on the pressure.

    • mal3oon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Well, they do have few mobile devices with Ryzen and QC chips, they have been investing heavily in Linux OS recently, so crossing fingers Libre phone would collaborate with them to release Libre Phone Black Magick to the gamers, that would sway a big chunk of Android enthusiasts to switch, and then apps would follow.

    • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If they decide to make the Steam Deck 2 actually a Steam Phone with controller attachments that could be a way for them to enter the mobile hardware.

      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Not enough cooling. A better idea would be to release a Steam Deck 2 with the same form factor as the 1 and a Steam Deck Mini with a phone form factor and the same performance as the original Deck.

        • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          I like the sound of the Steam Deck Mini. Maybe it could be the return of the Sony Xperia style phone.

  • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Google: “Based on this feedback and our ongoing conversations with the community, we are building a new advanced flow that allows experienced users to accept the risks of installing software that isn’t verified.

    I’ve been side loading apks since I bought my first Android phones and am much more concerned about malware “safe” apps from Google’s Play store. Google’s quality control is shit.

    • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Quality control is not the words. They are unethical garbage pieces of shit who make the world a worse place. These big companies buy smaller ones just so they have the good devs and no competition. Then they make everything in the market insufferable as fuck.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yes. I wonder how many people unknowingly updated Simple Mobile Tools apps after the new owner’s buy-in.

      • nuxi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The number of apps that I’ve had to unistall because they got quietly sold and turned into malware is alarming.

    • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I’m OK with jumping through more hoops – once.

      Once I told the device that I know what I’m doing, it shouldn’t be more than a pop-up per install.

      • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’d agree that the option is inportant to turn it off but one and done shouldn’t be the default cuz people fucking dumb, yo.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    That’s not good enough. They’re just going to keep lightly pushing against the bad publicity until everything not controlled by Google on your phone goes away.

    We need an alternative made without googles shitty hands in the mix. This forced duopoly between Apple and Google sucks. No phone competition in the US also sucks. Overpriced Samsung or a Google phone, while companies Like Red Magic have fan and liquid cooled phones with huge batteries, more ram, and more storage, for less than a grand being sold around the rest of the world outside the US.

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      We need an alternative made without googles shitty hands in the mix. This forced duopoly between Apple and Google sucks.

      That goes for MS and Apple on the desktop too, and allegedly Google is trying to enter that space as well for the umpteenth time.

      At least as far as PCs are concerned, they’re still unlocked at the bootloader level, despite MS’ attempts to lock that down, and there’s nothing stopping you from installing Linux or BSD on your PC still. Mobile devices outside a handful which aren’t locked down, unfortunately don’t have that luxury.

    • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Oneplus had great success but then enshittified. Raised prices to match Samsung and Google, outsourced support to some place that didn’t sound like they were even in the same dimension as any English speakers and took away their ability to help customers even by accident and finally quality of their phones went to shit.

      They could’ve sucked the Chinese government subsidy tit for another few years and would’ve established themselves as legit competition, but that would only delay inevitable enshittification by a few years.

    • baconsunday@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Stop it. You’re reminding me why I want to move my family out of the US. Its not just phones, everything is a facade here.

  • Elsie@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s not sideloading, it’s installing. Stop giving into this idea that installing other apps is somehow bypassing normal methods!

  • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Google is paving the ground for Linuxphones.
    It’s so blatantly obvious how evil they’ve become that it makes striving for alternatives a necessity.

    • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I want a linux phone! I heard Cape phones will be a thing for the general public in 2026. They said that they and the provider are very privacy focused. I pray they are being truthful.

        • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I learned about it recently, too. I am sick of feeling like I am prisoner with an ankle monitor. Even if I leave my phone at home I still feel like someone is just itching to nab me for some bullshit made up crap.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    We are designing this flow specifically to resist coercion, ensuring that users aren’t tricked into bypassing these safety checks while under pressure from a scammer. It will also include clear warnings to ensure users fully understand the risks involved, but ultimately, it puts the choice in their hands.

    The current system requires user to enable developer options, which is already hidden behind a dark pattern (tapping the Build number multiple times) then enabling the installation of apps of unknown sources for specific apps, which also comes with a warning.

    It’s basically what we have already, so cut the bullshit and leave it be.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      dark pattern

      This is not what dark pattern means.

      Also, I don’t think enabling developer options is required to install arbitrary APKs.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Err, that’s not true on the last fee devices I’ve used, Pixels and a Fairphone. Installing apps from APK files doesn’t require me to enable dev options. In fact trying to install an APK from say Files brings me straight to the permission setting. It’s also per-app. It can be accessed under Settings > Apps > Special app access > Install unknown apps.

    • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      On Samsung it’s: download APK, run it, see the warning, tap “allow third party installations”, flick a switch, tap “install”.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      that warning was not at all prominent, and as others have said, t does not exist anymore on modern android

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If this flow existed once for disabling the entire feature permanently, I would be okay with it. But it seems like they are going to intentionally make installing any software they don’t get a piece of painful to install every time. That is not an acceptable compromise.

  • snooggums@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Users only need to eat half of a shit sandwich!

    This is less terrible news, not good news.

    • Dagnet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      This new ‘flow’ will require drinking a verification can (of piss) every time you want to use a sideloaded app