• BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    people are too often blinded by what they wish they had they forget the great things they do have

    im not gonna complain that fallout 1 and 2 arent first person games. i appreciate there are different ways fallout has been made. even brotherhood of steel even though that game really sucks

    • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Of course you’re not going to complain about Fallout 1 and 2, you’re viewing them in hindsight.

      Imagine if Fallout 5 comes out and it’s just a gacha game. Were you expecting that, or were you expecting something that stayed faithful to Fallout 4’s crafting and exploration mechanics?

      Same story with Fallout 4. New Vegas was the previous Fallout game, and people were expecting 4 to model itself after its roleplaying.

      West Coast Fallout fans are, unfortunately, not blinded by what they wish they had. They wish they had a post nuclear role playing game that focuses on the utter humanity of the trials and terrors with which you’re presented, and they have that in 1, 2, and New Vegas. They just also wanted the series to carry on that tradition. There’s nothing wrong with spinoffs or trying new things, but to not have player choice as a design pillar in an RPG is a misstep, I think.

      I say ‘they,’ but in reality I am a West Coast Fallout fan. Again, I love Fallout 3, and I’ve played a shitload of 4. But 3 is not exactly well thought out in terms of lore, and 4 feels more like Borderlands than Fallout in both gameplay and tone.

      It’s just not what I’m looking for in an RPG, and I do wish Bethesda would accurately respond to feedback. Because they still think that the voiced character was the main thing we had a problem with, when The Witcher 3 came out the same year to critical renown.

      • BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        wasteland is what the og fallout fans have. it was the original fallout. that has had new games recently as well

        and if fallout 5 came out and was a gacha game, I’d certainly be surprised, but if it was good like (almost) all the other games then that’d be cool too

        • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Right. But do you think that marketing that game as Fallout 5 sets reasonable expectations, or should it perhaps be released as Fallout: Gacha? That’s merely my point.

          I’m not really sure what your point about the Wasteland series is. Yes, I can go play Wasteland 1, 2, or 3. I’m talking about how it’s going to cause ire if you start deprioritizing foundational aspects of an ongoing series. Which Fallout 3 started, and Fallout 4 continued, and Fallout 76.

          • BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            my point on wasteland is if people arent a fan of the direction fallout turned, they still have wasteland as an option

            • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              It is a good option indeed. But, we’re Fallout fans. I, personally, would like to see more games in that world that carry on its deep exploration of humanity, player choice, and RPG themes. Fallout’s a big part of a lot of people’s lives, and I think that it’s perfectly normal to want it to continue in its own tradition.

              I don’t think it’s reasonable to be, like, toxic or obsessed about it, but it’s totally okay to criticize series you like. Vocal feedback from the fanbase helps build the community. Bethesda’s business model is based upon mass appeal, which means drawing in fans of other game types. This really boosted the popularity of Fallout with Fallout 3, where they sought to draw in FPS fans. Then Fallout 4 brought in survival crafting elements. These aren’t bad additions, but they focused on those over the actual RPG mechanics.

              You see the feedback here. It’s community-wide, not just Lemmy. In this case, Todd Howard has missed the point of what fans didn’t like about the game mechanics. They have a new audience, and there’s no need to actually delve into the problems that people had.

              It’s just a weird experience to have the dev of your favorite series be like, “Actually, we want a new audience,” and start catering to a different crowd using the series you like. I also totally get why people that prefer the Bethesda Fallout games feel that way, they do their gameplay loops solidly and are dripping with atmosphere. But there’s always going to be ire from the community if they just kinda, stop caring about the experience that drew in the people that gave Fallout its initial success. Which it really feels like they have. Or maybe Fallout fans are just whiny, idk. Thanks for reading my essay.