I guess now we finally know why Babbage never finished building the Analytical Engine.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Oh like when you type “population of tenton” and it returns “Did you mean Trenton? That population is XYZ”

    • snooggums@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Yes, except in the case of Babbage’s machine they were asking if putting 1235 instead of 1234 would give the same answer.

      Search engines work that way because of having large large datasets and pattern recognition that can suggest based on typos. Calculators don’t do that.

      • saimen@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Yeah but calculator back then was a profession. So if suddenly a machine can replace a complete profession it’s at least conprehensible to assume it can do more than it actually can. It’s basically the same with AI right now. There is this “overshoot” of what is expected from a new paradigm shifting technology. Similar to how people 100 years ago thought there will be flying cars by now.

        • snooggums@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Helicopters are flying cars.

          It is possible that the question was intended to be about human error checking prior to starting the process of calculating, like noticing a lack of a decimal on a monetary number in a data set, and Babbage misunderstood. That would be a valid question, but isn’t how the quote is phrased.