• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    That’s pretty much anywhere in the third world, FYI. It’s just how things work until you have many decades of stability and democracy to unlearn it. Corruption used to be a way of life in the West, too. There were operas about it.

    • sleepundertheleaves@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Corruption is still a way of life in the United States. But the bribes we pay to cops and regulators cost so much, only corporations and multi-millionaires can afford them. Corruption in the Third World is democratic; here, it’s a privilege of the rich.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        45 minutes ago

        You clearly have no idea what it’s like outside the Western world.

        (That’s a statement about your own privilege, not a criticism of them)

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      India has 70 years of democracy, but according to my coworkers there are just too many people (density) to enforce laws. You shut something down, there’s another thing tomorrow

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        They have had democracy longer than typical, and are a challenge to explain in that sense, but not really stability or prosperity.

        Whichever theory you subscribe to, this is an empirical observation. Visit Africa or Latin America or SE Asia and you’ll see similar things. (And the first two can be pretty low density, FWIW)