• iBaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      108
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      11 months ago

      What can he do about it? We live in a free market society. All he can do is keep talking about it and hope the people get the message. Rebellion will start at the consumer level and go up, not the other way around. Main problem is the millions of people that rely on Fox for their news.

      • WeeSheep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        133
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Use the anti monopoly laws we have in place to prevent price gouging from lack of competition

          • 4am@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Sorry to be pedantic on the internet (lol) but it might be more accurate to say inflation has slowed.

            • protist@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Burn the pedant!

              I still think decreased is accurate though, the rate of inflation is significantly smaller today vs then, so the rate has decreased

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          How would you like the President of the United States to do that? Do you think the President is a dictator that can just unilaterally pass sweeping legislation? How do you think the public would react if the President had the power to directly determine the prices of goods? How do you think that would go in general?

      • Deiv@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Damn there is nothing the government can do. Sorry guys :( You’ll just have to buy less food, and maybe then the corporations will get the hint!

        Regulations? Laws against price gauging? Naw, they can’t do that. It’s the consumers that are at fault!

        • iBaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          Do you think Biden makes the laws? Did you fail civics class? I said nothing about enacting laws making what these companies are doing illegal, I only said Biden can’t do much about it.

      • graymess@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Price controls are well within the president’s powers. It’s not that radical of a concept.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s within congress’s powers for sure. I don’t think the president. Congress has done it in the past though, so they for sure can again.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Price controls are an extremely radical concept, themselves. Last thing this economy needs is further distortion.

          The sucky thing about inflation is you have to run through it like an illness.

          • Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Windfall taxes. Let them share their gains, that’s the whole point of taxes since society don’t work otherwise.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              That’s vastly different from a direct price control, in both intent and effect.

              I’d love to pass lots more taxes but with the current House that’s completely impossible

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Do you know basic US Civics, or…? Biden has the bully pulpit (basically what he’s doing here), and that’s pretty much it. He can issue executive orders (and has in the past about this), but those are often complete bullshit that’s unenforceable, and will be removed by the next person in the office.

          Take a look at Trump rolling back Obama’s EPA purview over waterways in the US for a recent example that has left over 60% of our nation’s waterways now unprotected.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      It will be harder to pass new laws in the current Congress, but he still has control over the executive branch. Hopefully some existing laws could be used.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        He appointed the most aggressive FTC head in decades who is using the antitrust law we have to currently go after Google and Amazon.

        She’s also fighting a merger between Kroger and Albertsons, which would drastically raise grocery prices.

        The FTC is also fighting the hedge fund buyout of preciously independent healthcare clinics, which has massively ramped up medical costs.

        Not to mention breaking the real estate agent fee monopoly.

        His executive branch has been busy as hell trying to help people.

        • Locuralacura@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Don’t tell us facts. We’ve already decided to believe whatever the fuck we want regardless. /s

    • pan_troglodytes@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      that was basically it. short of siccing the irs on them there’s not a lot the executive branch can do about it… of course that’d kill the golden goose named “campaign contributions”, so it wont happen

    • TheDubz87@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean, you wouldn’t want the politicians to lose their legal bribes generous donations over acting in our interests instead of the corporations, would you?

      Will someone please think of the rich folks pockets?

      • forrgott@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        How is it possible that people don’t understand the implied “/s” here??? Or am I missing some other reason for the downvotes?

        FWIW, I thought your comment was great. Gave me quite a chuckle! :-D

        • TheDubz87@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s because I said bad things about Biden, even though I was talking about politicians as a whole. But you can’t say bad things about Biden or be any kind of critical about the current administration without getting trashed on here.

    • FakinUpCountryDegen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      All he can do is back out his limp-dick economic policies that are destroying the country and creating this problem…but there’s no chance of that.

      This damage is literally the point of the policies. What people don’t understand is that he’s doing this on purpose.

      • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oh and passed an executive order, along with having his justice department pursue more antitrust cases than any other administration.