It’s APAC. APAC buys our elections. We need to be wary of APAC and any other “big donors” and their intentions at every corner. That’s why the grassroots campaigns are such a huge deal, that’s why Mamdani in New York is such a huge deal too, it shows that’s who THE PEOPLE want, not some rich guy with horrible intentions.
If a grassroots campaigner can win a place like New York then I have much more hope for this country than previously.
Its the two party system that allows things like APAC to function. If you could toss aside a party you would have done so as soon as this sort of crap popped up, but you can’t so both parties just get worse and worse and worse.
It’s two sides of the same coin. APAC and donors with unlimited money quietly sponsor their candidates, and the people don’t vote for the third+ party because they don’t see those candidates, or once they do, they don’t see it winning against those with unlimited money.
The only good I can see coming out of any of this is a ton of people are seeing where the Democratic party failed them since we’re in this mess in the first place, and the younger “Dems” who are socialist in policy will push for more progressive policies, thus creating a truly progressive party, which is the whole reason they identify as “dems” in the first place, is the progressive policy.
It’s APAC. APAC buys our elections. We need to be wary of APAC and any other “big donors” and their intentions at every corner. That’s why the grassroots campaigns are such a huge deal, that’s why Mamdani in New York is such a huge deal too, it shows that’s who THE PEOPLE want, not some rich guy with horrible intentions.
If a grassroots campaigner can win a place like New York then I have much more hope for this country than previously.
Its the two party system that allows things like APAC to function. If you could toss aside a party you would have done so as soon as this sort of crap popped up, but you can’t so both parties just get worse and worse and worse.
It’s two sides of the same coin. APAC and donors with unlimited money quietly sponsor their candidates, and the people don’t vote for the third+ party because they don’t see those candidates, or once they do, they don’t see it winning against those with unlimited money.
The only good I can see coming out of any of this is a ton of people are seeing where the Democratic party failed them since we’re in this mess in the first place, and the younger “Dems” who are socialist in policy will push for more progressive policies, thus creating a truly progressive party, which is the whole reason they identify as “dems” in the first place, is the progressive policy.
deleted by creator