• zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    They need real talent and art too. Everything feels like a treadmill of slop to push the schedule forward.

    Meanwhile everyone knows who the guardians of the galaxy are, and no one mainstream did before Gunn

    • edcasting@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      . The problem is that finding another James Gunn —who can turn an obscure franchise about a talking raccoon and tree into one of the biggest hits in comic book movie history— is easier said than done. And I think Marvel got the wrong impression of their brand’s value with the Guardians of the Galaxy trilogy, thinking that it was the brand that made it a hit, and not Gunn’s understanding and respect for the source material. They got rid of all the original superheroes everyone loved and replaced them with complete unknowns cosplaying as them, thinking people would just buy them because of the Marvel Studios label. Glad they’re learning the lesson now.

      • zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The brand got them in the door. The art made them stay. And it’s been a long while since they had art to stick around for.

      • Microw@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The first Guardians of the Galaxy definitely was helped by the brands value. But yes, apart from that it certainly was down to the individual film makers and what they achieved. I would personally be sceptical re respect for the source material - Gunn et al changed a lot about the Guardians compared to the comics. And it worked.