• grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Tap for spoiler

      Yes, I know that “third gender” isn’t the same as a “dude” and that they chickened out by having Soren played by a female actor. But it still counts, damn it!

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Typically when I comment, I have something meaningful to add to the conversation. Sometimes though, I just find that an upvote isn’t enough to capture my emphatic agreement with a person.

        This is one of the latter times.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      I agree that two men kissing would’ve been far more controversial, but two women kissing was still definitely political in the 90s. I’ve read stuff from Deep Space 9 writers saying that the ability to have scenes like this is one of the reasons why they love sci-fi as a genre, because it allows you to explore things that would otherwise be difficult to depict, and explore themes in a more accessible way.

      I think they also said that they had to work hard to make it clear that whilst the taboo depicted in the episode was obviously allegorical for homosexuality, that in order for this to work, they needed to make it clear within the text of the episode that from the characters’ perspective, the taboo was around intimacy with a partner from a past life, not homosexuality.

    • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      You forget how recently gay rights were achieved and normalized.

      Except now fascists are trying to undo it, along with the rights of black people and other minorities.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        Lol, yeah… I don’t think too many people on this site are old enough to remember just how anti gay the 90’s were. This was literally one of the first depictions of lesbians kissing to be publicly televised in the US. I was living in the south at the time and they edited it out of the show.

        Interracial couples weren’t allowed to marry until 1967. Women weren’t allowed to have credit cards or their own bank accounts until 1974. Gay couples weren’t allowed to marry until 2015…

        Most of the people in Congress are old enough to have witnessed all of this progress in their lifetime, and a lot of them are working as hard as possible to undue it all.

        • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Girls gone wild came out in 1997. Girls were kissing and having sex in college long before that.

          This scene in DS9 was pure fan service. Sexy women kissing for the pleasure of men. Trying to couch it as a gay rights thing is pretty silly. They didn’t get married to each other on the show and they both had male love interests.

          • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 days ago

            Girls gone wild came out in 1997. Girls were kissing and having sex in college long before that.

            Porn does not equate to public acceptance… There’s been gay porn since cameras became a thing, that doesn’t mean the majority of Americans would be fine with it in their homes.

            This scene in DS9 was pure fan service. Sexy women kissing for the pleasure of men.

            The important part is that it was played on a publicly accessible network and a show many people watched with their families. Not every first ice breaker is a deep piece of art, but it often allows for shows later down the line to improve on the subject without taking as much heat.

            Also…“In the first draft, Dax’s former partner was written as male, but after this was changed, the story was cleared through studio executives. The Trill taboo was intended to be an allegory for homosexuality and homophobia.”

            It was purposely changed as a commentary on homophobia.

            • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              You’re not wrong that they cleared it with the network (they had to clear everything with the network). What you’re missing is that the execution of the scene, what we actually saw on screen, was pure titillation. It was sex and sex sold to a heterosexual (predominantly white) male audience.

              You’d have a much better case if it were 2 men kissing. Jonathan Frakes wanted to do that for TNG! He was shut down completely.

              • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 days ago

                What you’re missing is that the execution of the scene, what we actually saw on screen, was pure titillation. It was sex and sex sold to a heterosexual (predominantly white) male audience.

                You could make the same claim about Kirk Uhura… Just because it doesn’t fit your individual standards doesn’t mean it’s not significant.

                It was sex and sex sold to a heterosexual (predominantly white) male audience.

                Again… I don’t think you really understand just how conservative America was about gay relationships in the 90s. Just because it was what you labeled as sexy, does not mean that conservative America was highly critical of it.

                You’d have a much better case if it were 2 men kissing. Jonathan Frakes wanted to do that for TNG! He was shut down completely.

                Just because one minority gets representation doesn’t mean that a different minority suffers from it. You can both be happy for lesbian representation and disappointment for the lack of gay male representation.

                • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  No, Uhura is clearly more than a sex appeal character. That role would fall to Janice Rand.

                  I grew up in the 90s. I understand it perfectly well. We had everything from Elton John to RuPaul. We were a long, long way from the days of Paul Lynde and the wink wink nudge nudge approach.

                  You can both be happy for lesbian representation

                  That scene is not lesbian representation, it’s two straight women kissing for the benefit of the audience. It’s 100% shot from a straight male gaze perspective.

        • LordMayor@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Interracial couples weren’t allowed to marry until 1967. Women weren’t allowed to have credit cards or their own bank accounts until 1974.

          Interracial marriage was made legal nationally in 1967 but much longer outside of the Deep South. The bank account bit is just wrong. Credit cards is true.

          • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Interracial marriage was made legal nationally in 1967 but much longer outside of the Deep South.

            Yes, just like gay marriage was legal in some states before it was nationally. This does not make my statement incorrect, nor does your statement really add anything to the original claim.

            The bank account bit is just wrong.

            Again, you’re being unnecessarily pedantic. Some women were allowed to have bank accounts, but often had to have the permission of their husband or a male co-signer. Most women faced hurdles that made it difficult or impossible to obtain a bank account by themselves.

      • TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Oh believe me I don’t. I grew up in the era where “gay” was the ultimate swear word, it just meant anything bad.

        But lesbians were awesome.

        Chicks making out on tv was the norm, but generally it was presented as “straight” ladies performing for male enjoyment.

        As long as it was for gooning and going related activities, it wasn’t political.

        So much has changed…

  • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    Can’t wait for the day that my sex life is no one else’s business and when I can love who I want without other people having feelings. It’s my life. Back off!

      • Guy Ingonito@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Whats interesting to me is that in both cases the only reason they could get away with it was the appeal to white cis men.

        If it was a black guy and a white woman it would have caused riots.

        If it was two dudes it wouldn’t have made it to air.

        We should keep in mind that a lot of the progress we’ve made the last 30 years has been exploiting cis male sexuality. Maybe we could’ve avoided the far right resurgence if Netflix had a hit tv show about a sexy Syrian woman with a thing for blondes living in Berlin.

  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Isn’t a lesbian kiss episode (as well as a boxing match episode) a sign that a show has jumped the shark?

    Not that this scene didn’t live rent free in my head for years - just asking.