• IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    A better historical note would be to say … to have a bank account

    I think up until the 50s women couldn’t have a bank account in their name, without their husband signing for them or something. Up until then, women couldn’t have any money in their name in a recognized bank.

    For common women that is … if you were the ultra wealthy, you could afford to skirt around banking rules … but as a common woman with a bit of money, you couldn’t have a regular bank account of your own.

    • Thunderbird4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’re right except for the year. That wasn’t until 1974 that women could open back accounts in their own name.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s when legislation was passed ensuring banks couldn’t block a woman getting an account on her own. Before that it was dependant on the bank.