bold words from a promptfondler.

That’s rough buddy

I imagine that this might be the kind of thing someone would talk about in couples therapy.

can you provide more context?

It’s not perfect, but https://udm14.com/ is at least an improvement. I found it too tempting to read the AI answer that pops up right away and is often wrong.

… the search engines became crap because of ai

Plus, ai just lies. It’s not a replacement

I haven’t met that many dickheads here though, maybe one or two, but not as many as reddit.

Unless I’m the asshole.

what an unpleasant asshat

Removed by mod

My completely PIDOOMA take is that if you’re self-interested and manipulative you’re already treating most if not all people as lesser, less savvy, less smart than you. So just the fact that you can half-ass shit with a bot and declare yourself an expert in everything that doesn’t need such things like “collaboration with other people”, ew, is like a shot of cocaine into your eyeball.

LLMs’ tone is also very bootlicking, so if you’re already narcissistic and you get a tool that tells you yes, you are just the smartest boi, well… To quote a classic, it must be like being repeatedly kicked in the head by a horse.

I imagine there are a few reasons. An LLM is a narcissist’s dream–it will remain focused on you and tell you what you want to hear (and is always willing to be corrected).

In addition, LLMs are easy to manipulate, and sort of mimic a person enough to give you a sense of power or authority. So if you’re the type of person who gets something from that, there’s likely a draw to that kind of person.

Those are just guesses, though. I don’t use LLMs myself, so I don’t really know.

I’m just spitballing here, but I suspect it’s for the same reason people with “dark triad” traits (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy) are more successful in business and politics than the average person.

Dark triad types give quick, confident, and persuasive answers, and aggressively challenge anyone who disagrees with them. But they don’t actually care if the answers are true as long as they can win the debate or argument they’re having. This lets them be totally confident and persuasive in any situation - whether they know the answer or not - and so demonstrate more “leadership skills” than people who are less willing to bullshit.

Same with policies - a dark triad type is going to confidently and aggressively support policies that make him look good or benefit him personally in other ways. He doesn’t actually care whether they are good policies or bad policies, whether they’ll be good for the organization or the people or not - the dark triad type will lie, cheat, or steal to make sure his policies look successful, get himself promoted upwards, and blame his successor for the long term failure of the policy.

(If you were a dark triad type, you might, for example, enact policies that crash the economy and drive inflation through the roof while making yourself and your cronies incredibly rich, then cancel all the reports that track inflation, hunger, unemployment, etc, to conceal the impact of your policies, and go on a social media blitz claiming the economy is better than ever and any problems are someone else’s fault. Just as a hypothetical example.)

I’m kind of not surprised people who care more about persuasiveness than honesty, and more about results than processes, would find AI tools appealing.

Sorry, it’s science now.

like moths to a flame

So long as you keep your bullshit detector well-maintained, check the sources—and actually use an AI that cites it’s sources—I see nothing wrong with them. The tech is still in its infancy; it’ll improve with time.

fuck off asshat

Removed by mod