• chuckleslord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    … the search engines became crap because of ai

    Plus, ai just lies. It’s not a replacement

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      … the search engines became crap because of ai

      I mean, search has always been built on some kind of LLM. That’s how you convert a query into a list of page-results.

      We’ve just started trying to wrap the outputs into a natural language response pattern in order to make them feel more definitive and more engaging. The “AI” part of search is mostly window-dressing.

      Plus, ai just lies.

      It has inaccurate heuristics and often tries to back-fill what it can’t find with an approximation in order to maintain user engagement.

      Idk if I’d even call it lying, so much as bullshitting.

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I mean, search has always been built on some kind of LLM. That’s how you convert a query into a list of page-results.

        no it fucking hasn’t. the stemming and page ranking algorithms used in traditional search have absolutely nothing to do with LLMs.

        shit, neither stemming nor PageRank as originally defined even have a machine learning component. here’s postgres’ full text search suite, which literally converts a textual query into a list of results (sans page ranking, which is out of scope for a database) in a manner suitable for a production search engine, utterly without any machine learning or other stochastic crap.