‘maximum truth through first principles and physics’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA-FyI_5n50&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA - video
https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20251005-musks-grokipedia-grok-ai-rewrites-wikipedia - podcast
time: 4 min 10 sec
i wonder what else he had go wrong the last period he needed a distraction like this
For it to be authentic, they need multiple bots arguing on Talk pages and undoing each other’s edits.
Fuck off to mars already.
Guillotines don’t work in space, that’s why billionaires are so obsessed with going there.
Airlock can be a verb.
Does if you’re accelerating / decelerating.
Or add a rocket booster.
Make it out of a rail gun for an even more scifi version.
I’m sure explosive bolts or similar could take the place of gravity if needed.
So… They’re going to use the bot trained on wikipedia to rewrite wikipedia. Very much a Pierre Menard type situation.
Ah, but they can inject it with all kinds of fascist bullshit.
With Grok, Grokipedia aims for maximum truth through first principles and physics.
Fuck you.
Signed,
a physicist
Grokipedia aims for maximum truth through first principles and physics. It replaces partially masked evidences of how legacy media operates, rewriting with complete accurate context that cuts through the BS.
Christ, these people are so fucking stupid. Can’t wait to see how Nazi autocomplete solves the problem of induction.
Also, ‘fun’ fact. The second result for first principles on ddg is a blog post by a self-help guru sucking Musk off so hard you’d think they’re being held at gun point.
It’s not stupidity. It’s contempt.
Contempt for the truth, and contempt for anyone who believe truth is more important than power.
They will tell you what they want reality to be, because they have the power to dictate what you believe.
When we act, we create our own reality, as the anonymous Bush administration lackey said.
And you will believe them. Or else.
I agree, but I really do think it’s coupled with an (un)healthy dose of stupidity and delusion. These “free thinkers” really do think you can just pull knowledge out of the air from “first principals”, whatever the fuck that even means in their context. They are completely ignorant that we arrived at our current scientific understanding by countless people stumbling over countless invalid theorems, not to mention piles of peer review and hard work. And chances are most of what we think we know is wrong anyway!
So, Conservapedia but more banal?
Going on the Grok output, I saw: Conservapedia with more uses of the word fuck (it can now use the word fuck), extremely verbose mid insults and weird flirting.
I wonder where he’s going to get sources to cite.
They will all be just this one:
Because xpedia is too close to another company name.
