

I don’t see the problem, that looks like a typical McMansion to me.
Also, it’s nice the AI included a dedicated room for snorting cocaine (powder room).


I don’t see the problem, that looks like a typical McMansion to me.
Also, it’s nice the AI included a dedicated room for snorting cocaine (powder room).


all 19,797 submissions and 75,800 reviews (to one conference, in one year)
tired: Dead Internet Theory wired: Dead Conferences Theory


A week-ish ago I said that Mike Masnick is twice as annoying about AI as Dare Obasanjo.


I’m “LIne storee” babyee.


I think he’s just a true believer (or very good at lying).


I have better thoughts I can waste time on
Me too. Unfortunately I don’t get to pick my intrusive thoughts.


I have some thoughts about this goober (Simon Willison) that I need to get out of my head:
First the positives:
But, by his own admission:
Tl;dr: an experienced dev who uses clankers to churn out tons of technically functional hobby software and thinks this gives him right to speak for all software engineers.


OK, my bad. I was thinking about scenario like this: https://eneroutlook.enerdata.net/total-electricity-generation-projections.html
If you assume doubling of electricity production by 2050 (development + electrification) then 10% of that would mean more than double nuclear production.
5% would not really be a massive increase, my mistake, but would still mean more builds than retirement.


Could be, I don’t follow that closely. I’m not aware of any that come close to the level of shitshow of say, Hinckley Point C. That matters.


Yeah, I found his credulousness about "AI"quite amusing. Like when he went to a wrong station in Japan, because he asked ChatGPT. And posted about it, not realizing how much of a dumbass it made him look like. But it’s starting to wear off.
But hey, he at least admits there is a bubble.
And also, I haven’t unfollowed/muted/blocked Mike Masnick yet. And he’s at least twice as annoying about AI.
Unrelated: Did chrome just detect me writing about AI to shill Gemini to me? (puts on tinfoil hat)


If we’re talking about the general West, then there new nuclear is probably fucked. Rest of the world still builds for reasonable costs. Not nuclear bro amounts, but still.
I think we could see a future where nuclear makes 5-10% of the world’s electricity, which would technically make it a niche source of power, but it would also be a massive increase from today.


Sometimes, I get to peer into the AI pilled brain, and it is… uh… not good.
But now if I suffer from Imposter syndrome I can remind myself that some other people take advice from clankers.
https://bsky.app/profile/carnage4life.bsky.social/post/3m634z3r7kk2l

Transcript:
The fact I can login every morning and ask an AI to review all my emails and chats from yesterday then given what it knows about my goals and my role it should suggest what I could have done better is amazing.
Bubble or not, AI is huge for personal productivity and overall improvement.


AFAIK data warehouse = regular database data lake = place to keep various files that don’t fit into DB
Data lakehouse aims to integrate these two, I don’t think it’s a totally stupid idea.


In my days, that was called micromanagement and was generally frowned upon.


Context: Post #4 in my sequence of private Lightcone Infrastructure memos edited for public consumption.
(emphasis mine)
Look at this goober, trying to be THE cult leader.


This. Masayoshi son is selling furniture to YOLO more money into OpenAI.
I have no opinion, but I have to note that I keep reading “KeepAssXC …”


Pivot to bio-computing
tl;dr: AI! Agents! AI! Agents! AI! Agents! AI…
Just one thing that caught my attention:
Only 72.6%? So why the heck are the other almost 30% of devs using it? For funsies? They don’t say.
You’d think due to self selection effects most people who wouldn’t find using Copilot effective wouldn’t use it.
The only way that number makes sense to me is if people were force to use Copilot and… no, wait, that checks out.