I know you are being dense on purpose but for people who actually care to understand the topic.
My comment above specifically focused on issues of misappropriation of federal funds by insiders via corrupt contracting process with intermediary companies.
But corruption is systematic touches issues from sextortion to outright fake degrees for money.
Political influence in definition of educational policy, priorities; bribes and political considerations in school district mapping, school locations, accreditation systems for educational professionals, etc.
PROCUREMENT
Bribes to influence procurement process
including tender specifications;collusion
among contractors; bribes, collusion and political
considerations to influence the specifications of bids and the tender process.
BUDGET
Political influence and bribes in resource allocation; budget leakages, embezzlement and fraud in transfer of budgets:diversion of public into private accounts; embezzlement of funds raised by local NGOs and parent organizations
I explained to you how corruption works within education and provided examples of people and companies that were affilaites with obama admin who specifically made money on rttt
These people will never be prosecuted due to being regime whores.
If you think spending billions of dollars on dubious programs that provide no benefit is fine. Good for you.
I call that corruption. It is corruption under Obama and it is still corruption under trump.
Getting pissed about trumps red herrings while ignoring the actual issue is a clown exercise which is how this entire discussion started.
If you got a counter point, I would like to hear it.
Personally i don’t have a problem per se with “liberal” angles, but the entire program was a grift for obama admin and his crew.
Usage of specific consultants for grant writing and strategy.
Classic grifters like Pearson and McGraw-Hill
Tech contracting going to MSPs aligned with the Obama’s team along with big tech contracts.
There were also consultants who trained teachers and school admins.
Results were at best dubious. But billions flowed to Obama’s people.
Like i said above, ideology is secondary, this is about money flows.
Do you have anything that backs up your claims on the money flows?
Joanne Weiss, James Blew, Laura Schifter and Andrew Smarick careers among hundreds of others.
Look into Bellwether Education Partners and how much obama alumni ended up up grifing there.
Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning is another example.
I’m not sure what to look for do you have a source for your claims?
https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/assets/uploads/topic-guides/Topic-Guide-Corruption-in-Education.pdf
https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/anti-corruption/module-9/key-issues/manifestations-of-corruption-in-education.html
https://curbingcorruption.com/sector/higher-education/
I know you are being dense on purpose but for people who actually care to understand the topic.
My comment above specifically focused on issues of misappropriation of federal funds by insiders via corrupt contracting process with intermediary companies.
But corruption is systematic touches issues from sextortion to outright fake degrees for money.
There isn’t a single mention of any of the things from your previous comment in any of those links you sent.
Nothing 🤡
PROCUREMENT
BUDGET
So if you accuse someone of murder a definition of homicide is proof?
You changing topics now.
I explained to you how corruption works within education and provided examples of people and companies that were affilaites with obama admin who specifically made money on rttt
These people will never be prosecuted due to being regime whores.
If you think spending billions of dollars on dubious programs that provide no benefit is fine. Good for you.
I call that corruption. It is corruption under Obama and it is still corruption under trump.
Getting pissed about trumps red herrings while ignoring the actual issue is a clown exercise which is how this entire discussion started.
If you got a counter point, I would like to hear it.
Do you find these dealign acceptable?