Brown and MIT among nine schools told to back conservative views or risk losing federal support, sparking free speech fears
  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    32·
    1 day ago

    https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/assets/uploads/topic-guides/Topic-Guide-Corruption-in-Education.pdf

    https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/anti-corruption/module-9/key-issues/manifestations-of-corruption-in-education.html

    https://curbingcorruption.com/sector/higher-education/

    I know you are being dense on purpose but for people who actually care to understand the topic.

    My comment above specifically focused on issues of misappropriation of federal funds by insiders via corrupt contracting process with intermediary companies.

    But corruption is systematic touches issues from sextortion to outright fake degrees for money.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        22·
        1 day ago

        Nothing 🤡

        Political influence in definition of educational policy, priorities; bribes and political considerations in school district mapping, school locations, accreditation systems for educational professionals, etc.

        PROCUREMENT

        Bribes to influence procurement process including tender specifications; collusion among contractors; bribes, collusion and political considerations to influence the specifications of bids and the tender process.

        BUDGET

        Political influence and bribes in resource allocation; budget leakages, embezzlement and fraud in transfer of budgets: diversion of public into private accounts; embezzlement of funds raised by local NGOs and parent organizations

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            22·
            1 day ago

            You changing topics now.

            I explained to you how corruption works within education and provided examples of people and companies that were affilaites with obama admin who specifically made money on rttt

            These people will never be prosecuted due to being regime whores.

            If you think spending billions of dollars on dubious programs that provide no benefit is fine. Good for you.

            I call that corruption. It is corruption under Obama and it is still corruption under trump.

            Getting pissed about trumps red herrings while ignoring the actual issue is a clown exercise which is how this entire discussion started.

            If you got a counter point, I would like to hear it.

            Do you find these dealign acceptable?