Nearly a third of Americans – 30% – say people may have to resort to violence in order to get the country back on track, according to the latest PBS News/NPR/Marist poll.

It’s a sharp rise from 18 months ago, when 19% of Americans said the same.

  • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    We need a general strike. The country would be brought to its knees if deprived of profit and labor. That tactic was extremely effective in Chile in 2019, and had they not fallen for the trick of liberal reform, they would’ve had a successful revolution on their hands with virtually no bloodshed.

    If you aren’t in a union, then please consider joining the IWW to unionize your workplace (bonus: you’ll get higher wages, better benefits, and more time off if you succeed!) to strengthen a general strike if we finally manage to enact one (the UAW is planning one for May 1st 2028, but it could happen sooner)

    And for our international friends, you should join one as well, as fascism is gaining momentum globally. If your country isn’t listed below, just contact the IWW directly in the link above.

    • 🇦🇷 Argentina: FORA
    • 🇦🇺 Australia: ASF-IWA
    • 🇧🇷 Brazil: FOB
    • 🇧🇬 Bulgaria: ARS, CITUB
    • 🇩🇪 Germany: FAU
    • 🇬🇷 Greece: ESE
    • 🇮🇹 Italy: USI
    • 🇳🇱 🇧🇪 Netherlands & Belgium: Vriji Bond
    • 🇪🇸 Spain: CNT
    • 🇸🇪 Sweden: SAC
    • 🇬🇧 United Kingdom: UVW
    • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Can you afford not to get paid for 2 weeks? If so you’re in the minority. Most people can’t. Not to mention they have kids they are worried about, medical conditions that they can barely afford even with insurance. Rising housing and grocery costs. Etc…

      I’m not trying to be a downer. I would love to see this happen, but we need a “realistic” way to accomplish it, to convince a majority to participate.

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Wrong way of thinking, buddy boy.

        If you can’t afford to go without pay for 2 weeks now, then where do you think you’ll be in 2 years time?

        Act now while you’re breathing, for the sake of being able to breathe.

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Unions build up strike-funds with membership dues so that members can continue to receive a salary while striking, that’s why unions are so essential for working class people to be able to flex their power non-violently.

        Consider that Chile is a much less wealthy country than the US. but was able to successfully commit to a general strike for over a month.

          • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            37 minutes ago

            I’m familiar with the depressing statistic already, a little under 10%.

            However, bear in mind that the majority of the most critical infrastructure for making profit, such as ports, trains, trucking, and medical care have the highest rates of unionized jobs, and would still be incredibly effective for a general strike (Generally only 3.5% of the population would need to participate to have a meaningful effect). Even with our abyssal rate of unionization, we still hold incredible leverage if we choose to use it.

            The UAW has a general strike planned for May 1st 2028, which has real odds of working. Unfortunately it’s still 2 years out, and by that time may be too late. I’m hoping it’s moved up at some point.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Can they afford to live under a fascist dictatorship that crushes dissenters and disappears citizens at will? It seems that by “realistic” resistance you mean “without inconvenience” but we’re never going to get to that point. That seems to be what people are hoping for and it just doesn’t work that way. The longer we wait the more sacrifice will be required.

      • JayArr@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Realistic way is people just drop out of consumer economy to the fullest degree possible for them. Cancel all unnecessary subscriptions, shop local for only necessities. Look how quickly Disney blinked just because of a wave of cancellations, now do that everywhere.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          People are going to cite the Kimmel cancellations until we legally aren’t allowed to. I… am skeptical.

          A common talking point was that the real danger isn’t people who cancel out of solidarity: it is people who realize they have a disney plus subscription they haven’t used since Mandalorian Season 2. Because those are the bread and butter for these services and once people look at their bill and realize how much they have been spending over the years, they tend to not come back. And this all lined up with Disney (allegedly?) wanting to do a cost increase and enough “mainstream media” pointing out that Kimmel didn’t actually say anything even slightly controversial.

          Contrast that with stuff like Sucker Punch firing the dev who made a Mario and Luigi joke and tripling down on it… and nobody giving a shit because Ghost of Yotei is coming out! Or all the attempts at encouraging people to support BDS boycotts. I mean, Palestine was the single biggest issue and the sole reason the Democrats lost, right? Then… why is everyone leaping at new gamepass deals and so forth?

          Time and time again it is shown that people just don’t boycott luxury goods. If you can afford a luxury good you “earned it” and will find every possible excuse to keep buying it. What DOES tend to work is contacting the advertisers. Much like chuds contacted credit card companies to get gay games off Steam et al. Because, much like contacting your elected official, they understand that people actually caring enough to pick up the phone means a lot of people are REALLY angry.

          • ultranaut@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Palestine was not the sole reason Democrats lost or the single biggest issue for voters according to the polling data. There was a small percentage for whom it was their sole or primary motivation in voting.

      • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Perhaps this is why trump just declared war on nonprofits. They could potentially pull together resources to keep people fed during a coordinated nationwide strike.

        They in general exist to tackle goals directly opposed to fascist regimes, so it males sense to target them.

        Education, social justice, feeding the hungry, and protecting nature are all examples of goals Trump’s regime are staunchly against.

        • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          That’s why mutual aid organizations are essential. They operate outside of the legal system, so can’t be directly targeted as easily. If you or anyone else reading this have the time, please consider joining your local mutual aid group. That could be Food Not Bombs, a different group local to your city or town, or even your local church if you’re in a rural area.

          If you don’t have one in your area, start one! Here’s a little guide on how and where to find likeminded folk to start one with: https://infosec.exchange/@tinker/113589807117870451

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        To add on to this:

        Look what happens when people protest or go on strike. Everyone SAYS they are in full solidarity with the workers at Starbucks. But they also gotta get to work and that picket line is really holding up traffic… and now they also need to drive three blocks away to a different Starbucks. Look, something something no ethical consumption under capitalism so fuck you I earned this coffee milkshake and maybe if you worked harder you could buy one too.

        A General Strike requires a fairly overwhelming majority of support to begin with. And, if we had that… we wouldn’t be inching ever closer to a civil war.

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            It isn’t about being “hard”. It is about being “effective” and understanding the circumstances and impact.

            But also… yeah, “this is going to be really hard” IS a consideration when it comes to social action. Because you have very few chances at that before people get bored or get demoralized. One of the most cliche examples are all the college kids who inevitably get super behind a candidate who doesn’t win and then they start insisting that voting doesn’t matter.

            But the inverse of this is a very real consideration amongst the people who organize protests and resistance. There is a shocking amount of effort “behind the scenes” to downplay stupid fucking bullshit like “make your profile picture black”. Because people do it and say “I helped” and start ignoring you. And while there is a LOT of discussion and argument regarding the utility of the parade protests… at least those get people outside.

            And the start of any form of action is to understand what the impact of said action is and whether it is even feasible to begin with.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I agree that a general strike is the absolute least that should be done. But a general strike would have to hit the ground with the EXPECTATION that it will get violent.

      It’s inevitable that Cheeto will try to use his jackbooted thugs to crack down hard, and taking it meekly and then hoping to sue over it later won’t be an option.

      When the MAGA S.A. come to put you down, they aren’t going to stop. I’m not saying that the strikers should start violence. But go in eyes open with the understanding that a a certain point, you all are going to have to make the fuckers bleed because they won’t think twice about doing it to you.

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        At this point I’m tired of people trying to give a prescription for the ‘right way to do things’

        “A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” Hunter S. Thompson

        • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 minutes ago

          The problem is there absolutely is many, many wrong paths to take, and we have to learn from past attempts to avoid their mistakes. Notice how the arab spring movement, while initially promising, ultimately failed to prevent a new authoritarian regime from taking hold in most of those countries.

          There are going to be different prescriptions from all political ideologies, but most of them can be dismissed to narrow down the possibilities.

          • Right-Libertarians will advise we privatize everything and remove regulations - Doesn’t work. Creates the conditions for Neo-fuedalism and capital dominating every aspect of life.
          • Moderates/Social Democrats will suggest we can reform our way out of this by voting for the right people - Didn’t work in Nazi Germany, didn’t work in Franco’s Spain. Due to corporate capture, they ultimately cannot resolve the issues that cause people to foolishly shift toward fascism in hopes to escape those issues.
          • Marxist-Leninists will say we just need a revolution with a Vanguard party - Doesn’t work. Results in extremely unfree authoritarian states like the USSR, North Korea, and China’s CCP. Basically state capitalism under the guise of socialism in name only.

          That leaves the Libertarian-left/Anarchists. We have evidence that their methods result in pretty sweet outcomes, they just have never survived very long due to the whole world usually being against them.

          Okay, so what do we do to in our case? First off, avoiding a civil war or extreme violence is vastly preferable, as the alternative has some big downsides. The best non-violent method we have at our disposal is a General Strike, which directly targets the machinery that fascist states rely on. Combined with mutual aid networks and civil disobedience, it has a rather good chance of preventing a fascist takeover with a minimum of violence.

          The alternative is straight up revolution, which requires the participating population to be educated on a shared vision, methods to organize, and how to avoid centralizing power structures or cult of personalities which lend themselves to co-option by the above mentioned groups.

    • the_q@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This is the only path other than violence and just as likely not to happen.

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        If the law would lead us to fascism, then the law must not be followed. They will come for us regardless of if we follow the law or not.