I wrote in this post that I’m uncomfortaple to argue “genetical[ly] or genealogical[ly]” why people “belong” in some place or another. I think that’s ethno-nationalist reasoning and a “weapon of the enemy” reasoning applies. Even if it’s in favour of Palestinians.
But apparently, that’s “settler-colonialist apologism” for dessalines. Ethno-nationalism is ok if it’s targeting “the right” people, I guess. /s
I think the reasoning of the comment removal is bollocks. Just because I don’t want to argue why someone “belongs” someplace because of their genes, I’m not all of a sudden in favour of settler-colonialism.
Removed by mod
Do not violate the disengage rule
Accusing other of bad faith is not a violation?
Arguably it can be an explanation for the disengage but I agree it should be phrased differently, which is why I issued a warning to them as well
But you didn’t remove his comment. The rule should be applied to both of us