I wrote in this post that I’m uncomfortaple to argue “genetical[ly] or genealogical[ly]” why people “belong” in some place or another. I think that’s ethno-nationalist reasoning and a “weapon of the enemy” reasoning applies. Even if it’s in favour of Palestinians.

But apparently, that’s “settler-colonialist apologism” for dessalines. Ethno-nationalism is ok if it’s targeting “the right” people, I guess. /s

I think the reasoning of the comment removal is bollocks. Just because I don’t want to argue why someone “belongs” someplace because of their genes, I’m not all of a sudden in favour of settler-colonialism.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      21·
      23 days ago

      Arguably it can be an explanation for the disengage but I agree it should be phrased differently, which is why I issued a warning to them as well

      • mrdown@lemmy.world
        14·
        23 days ago

        But you didn’t remove his comment. The rule should be applied to both of us