The mod banning these users is the same mod who made the posts they downvoted. This is mod abuse, turning the downvote button into an auto-self-ban button.

The message is “If you disagree with me, you will be banned”

Monitoring and banning users for using lemmy as intended to signal boost your opinion should be grounds to have all mod privileges removed. This behaviour undermines the integrity of the server and the wider fediverse.

  • verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Thanks for the context and for cross posting, this is turning into an interesting discussion across a wider variety of skill sets. Skill sets, as in the following: power users, people who don’t like mods and have done it before, people who have never modded but know exactly how it should be done, basic end users who are former mods.

    • Coupable@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hey Verity, I support your right to do this (note: those are all my comments), even if you don’t!

      Have a great day, and don’t shy away from that downvote button <3

      • verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Wow, you’re calling me out too and I’m not even a mod any more. Keep that powdered wig high and lice-free, Robespierre.

        • Coupable@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          hah ‘Robespierre’ - Good one, probably.

          Just funny you are serial downvoting in defence of banning people for serial downvoting :D

          Let me guess, hypocrisy is only cool when you do it.

          • verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I downvoted your comments because I’m petty and it’s fun and it doesn’t matter very much. We started out all high minded and now we’re here, in the mud, slinging mud, like the Jacobins. So you win. Here’s a box of wheat starch for your 'do, live it up.

            • Coupable@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              No I agree, your vote is yours and there’s no bad vibes from me for using it how you see fit.

              But I mean, come on, can’t you see the joke in down voting several of my comments all at once, because you don’t agree with my opinion that down voting several things at once is actually fine to do?

              Either way, I wasn’t trying to get your hackles up, so sorry if I did.

          • Skavau@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            That’s not hypocrisy. People who support moderators rights to ban people from their community for mass downvoting aren’t saying no-one should ever downvote, and that all bans for downvoting are automatically justified.

            • Coupable@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              This post is about threelon banning multiple people for downvoting one (1) time on one (1) post.

              And it is hypocrisy, along with a helping of poor reading comprehension apparently. If you disagree with this post, you would actually have been banned several times by now lol.

              But seeing as you are talking about my other post, how many times do you believe a user should be allowed to disagree before it warrants a ban for disagreeing too much?

              • Skavau@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Yes, I know what the post is about. I’m just talking about generally here. You can downvote, and still be in favour of public upvoting and downvoting.

                But seeing as you are talking about my other post, how many times do you believe a user should be allowed to disagree before it warrants a ban for disagreeing too much?

                That’s a false premise regarding my position. It’s not about any particular number or specific threshold being met. I think it’s reasonable for a community moderator to ban someone who never contributes to the community but instead just downvotes anything on the page. Especially if its a small community trying to grow. There are people on my communities now that downvote, but they also interact and also upvote, and they don’t just downvote everything. So it’s whatever.

                • Coupable@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Downvoting is contributing, just in a way you apparently don’t like.

                  You should step down as a mod. Also please leave me alone, we have already had this conversation, and I made myself very clear.

                  • Skavau@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 days ago

                    Downvoting is contributing, just in a way you apparently don’t like.

                    I disagree.

                    You should step down as a mod. Also please leave me alone, we have already had this conversation, and I made myself very clear.

                    You literally just asked me a question, and I replied.

                    Furthermore: This is a public thread. I’ll reply to who I like.