The Charlie Kirk shooting suspect is in state custody, NBC News confirms.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    1 day ago

    “I hope he’s going to be found guilty, I would imagine, and I hope he gets the death penalty”

    -Trump

    How pathetic a world we live in where the POTUS wants the state to kill people and is proudly quoted about it more than once in his lifetime. I get that sometimes we want people to die. Trump’s death will be gleefully celebrated worldwide, and I will join.

    But there’s just something so insidious about people in power wanting the government to kill people THAT HAVE NOT EVEN BEEN PROVEN GUILTY OF ANYTHING. Trump campaigning for the death penalty for Central Park Five should’ve been enough to disqualify him from ever being seen as a decent person. And yet millions ignore or agree with his sentiments of executing first and asking questions later. I cannot even fathom that anyone can fully think through the death penalty and still support it. Not even for the proven-guilty. Because there’s almost always some possibility of error. How can anyone support laws that could ever possibly lead to the state murdering an innocent person? Like, ever, one time? What a sick world.

    • Nougat@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s a whole lot of real good reasons to be against capital punishment. Little t promoting it is just one more.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        I agree. It’s a very rare thing that Trump ever supports, does, says, or likes a thing that isn’t revolting. Any time an exception to that rule seems to come to light, I have to question if I have a wrong/horrible belief. He’s just such a consistently shitty person that it’s hard to fathom.

    • ccunning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not really sure which part of “Lock her up” implied “…after due process and a conviction by a trial of her peers” so this shouldn’t really be too surprising.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If you read my comment, you’ll find no hint of surprise that Trump himself would say this. In fact I reference another time he did this, in the 80s.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    Very telling that no one is talking about his skin color or ethnicity

    If he had been black, that detail would have been repeated endlessly … almost joyfully.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    Quite possibly they captured the kid from the stairwell photos, but I’m not convinced yet he’s the shooter. Notably, no gun in the photo and no way a long rifle fits in that backpack.

    • ccunning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I thought they’d already found the gun left behind?

      EDIT: Oh! Were these photos before the shooting? I assumed they were from after.

      • Nougat@fedia.ioOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 day ago

        The theory is that the rifle was disassembled to fit in a backpack. This is what Ear Shooter did to get into position. However, Crooks used an AR-15 style rifle, which breaks down into much smaller pieces than an “older model [bolt-action] Mauser 30-06”.

        I’m going to want to see exactly what rifle it was, what condition it was found in (assembled or not, specifically), before speculating any further.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Granted, I’m not familiar with how a Mauser .30-06 breaks down either, my experience with that caliber is my grand-dad’s Remington 721 that I inherited.

          But on that gun, even if you remove the barrel, the wood stock aint fitting in a backpack.

          (721 is super dangerous too! Can fire without touching the trigger. Mine has been fixed:

          https://youtu.be/NlzoMqtDUxs#t=3m54s)

          • Nougat@fedia.ioOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, I’m withholding my opinion on the breakdown capability until there’s sufficient information, even if that’s the “official theory”. I mean, even if the stock was cut down, it looks like the shortest barrel would have been 22 inches, but an “older” one looks like it would more likely have a 24 inch barrel. The rifle is reported to have been scoped, so it could have been cut short, no need for the front sight.

            But someone who’d planned that well … would they have just left it in the woods? Instead of continuing to carry it with them still hidden in the backpack?

          • Nougat@fedia.ioOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, based on the “cultural messages” thing turning out to be shaky at best, I’m going to exercise patience.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          These threads always degrade into gun nuts listing off facts about gun models no one cares about and are inrrelevant.

  • CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    For some reason this “news report” lemants the fact that we don’t use the same fascist mass surveillance and image recognition technology that the Chinese Communist Party uses in China. Glossing over the fact that it wasn’t needed to find the suspect. Also glossing over all the issues that would come with the adoption of such tools such as false positives and racial bias.

  • ccunning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    This person is in state custody at the moment. Of course there will be an interesting push and pull as there often is between federal and state authorities about who charges first and whether there are federal charges warranted here.

    What would federal charges be?

    • Assassassin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      Anything they want? They’re sending people to concentration camps in Africa with no due process. I wouldn’t expect anything less than trumped up charges and a farce of a trial. At this point, they might just go full mask off and just execute the guy.

      • Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m gonna guess that they’ll do exactly what Kirk himself wanted: Make it a public execution and encourage parents to bring their kids to watch. They won’t waste this opportunity to normalize public punishments for people who dare to speak out against hatred, bigotry, intolorance, and cruelty. Empathy cannot exist under fascism.

        • Nougat@fedia.ioOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s true that this administration has failed to get many grand juries to indict, but I’m sure they will completely avoid the topic of jurisdiction.