• Nobody@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I prefer the old crusty people who either sat by and did nothing or played an active role in the economic inequality in the US becoming worse than pre-Revolution France.

    Imagine being more greedy and self-absorbed than Louis IVX, but just one of many oligarchs whose only motivation is your own enrichment even if it kills the entire planet.

    Not a single FDR among them. Not one that cares enough to try to stop it.

  • Deadeyegai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’d rather have these young, competent people aiming to make people’s lives better than those younger, completely incompetent DOGE incels breaking basic services and leaking people’s sensitve data.

  • Godort@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    5 hours ago

    More than half of these people are over 30. None are younger than 25.

    All of the founding fathers save for Adams and Washington were younger than this when the declaration of independence was signed.

      • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If you survived childhood, there was a decent chance you’d live to your 60s, IIRC. Obviously disease and injury were more dangerous, but childhood killed off those most likely to succumb to disease.

        • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yup. Infant mortality was such a large problem before modern medicine and vaccine science that the sheer number of deaths before the age of 5 reduced the mean average live expectancy by half of the mode average.

          And this, children, is why learning how to properly interpret math and statistics is important. Numbers can, in fact, lie unless you know exactly what those numbers represent.

          • Frog@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 minutes ago

            i wonder if someone calculated life expectancy without including infant mortality.

            • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 minutes ago

              Eh, not really but kinda. The available recorded data for that information is scarce and not a complete picture. Some studies were done but they are centered on things like “expectancy of tenants/landowners” for example, not the overall picture. It’s a complicated topic and I don’t fully understand it myself.

              Though, what I do know, is that through other methods of anthropological and archeological research methods, like examining bones, we are able to prove that people generally lived into their 50s-60s.

  • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I thought political experience made you part of the swamp and the deep state. Now we want political experience? How does one go about gaining experience without running in the first place?

  • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Holy shit! Ambitious young people who know their shit! What… what a shame…? (Is this supposed to be bad?)

  • Angelusz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    USA is going to be so different when the old people go to grave…

    Goes for more than just the USA ofc., but you guys put it on display. ^^