When having to admit their fault the moderator started looking for arbitrary reasons to ban me. Such as not using the exact terminology of the Amnesty report. Which does not call it genocide.


The moderator is also watching user votes, and calling out people not voting with him.

      • goat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Oh I had the same disengage rule but still got snarked by your snarky snark community

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          You “had the same disengage rule”? What does that even mean? I didn’t see you using disengage anywhere, and the disengage rule doesn’t protect you from being talked about, only from being talked to.

                • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Your disengage rule is not our disengage rule? Our disengage rule is not preventing us talking about you or your comm in our own instance?

                  • goat@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    6 days ago

                    You’re more obtuse than a right angle.

                    I have a disengage rule for my community, yet when that rule is used, my community is featured on this snark comm. It’s hypocritical for this comm to be criticising mine for that rule when you use it yourself.