When having to admit their fault the moderator started looking for arbitrary reasons to ban me. Such as not using the exact terminology of the Amnesty report. Which does not call it genocide.
The moderator is also watching user votes, and calling out people not voting with him.
You can read through that thread I linked and figure it out
I did. Nothing relevant to the disengage rule.
no i also had a disengage rule for my community
Your disengage rule is not our disengage rule? Our disengage rule is not preventing us talking about you or your comm in our own instance?
You’re more obtuse than a right angle.
I have a disengage rule for my community, yet when that rule is used, my community is featured on this snark comm. It’s hypocritical for this comm to be criticising mine for that rule when you use it yourself.
Again, we don’t use your rule. Our rule doesn’t prevent us from talking about your moderation practices. Therefore no hypocrisy.
You’ve gone so obtuse you’ve fallen flat.
My community. Disengagement rule. Your community, it too disengagement rule. Rule are on different community. But rule are same.
You use disengagement. Is fine.
I use disengagement. is not fine.
You are hypocrite
Sure, but our comm is not your comm? Your comm rules do not apply to our comm?
Why do you think your rules should apply to areas you don’t control? Even in our own disengage rule, we say we can’t control what happens in other instances.
When I used my community’s disengagement rule to temporarily ban (now expired) a user from my community, this snark community got upset.
Yet when you use your disengagement rule to ban users, this community is silent.
Do you realise the double-standard or are you just double-stupid?