When having to admit their fault the moderator started looking for arbitrary reasons to ban me. Such as not using the exact terminology of the Amnesty report. Which does not call it genocide.
The moderator is also watching user votes, and calling out people not voting with him.
no i also had a disengage rule for my community
Your disengage rule is not our disengage rule? Our disengage rule is not preventing us talking about you or your comm in our own instance?
You’re more obtuse than a right angle.
I have a disengage rule for my community, yet when that rule is used, my community is featured on this snark comm. It’s hypocritical for this comm to be criticising mine for that rule when you use it yourself.
Again, we don’t use your rule. Our rule doesn’t prevent us from talking about your moderation practices. Therefore no hypocrisy.
You’ve gone so obtuse you’ve fallen flat.
My community. Disengagement rule. Your community, it too disengagement rule. Rule are on different community. But rule are same.
You use disengagement. Is fine.
I use disengagement. is not fine.
You are hypocrite
Sure, but our comm is not your comm? Your comm rules do not apply to our comm?
Why do you think your rules should apply to areas you don’t control? Even in our own disengage rule, we say we can’t control what happens in other instances.
When I used my community’s disengagement rule to temporarily ban (now expired) a user from my community, this snark community got upset.
Yet when you use your disengagement rule to ban users, this community is silent.
Do you realise the double-standard or are you just double-stupid?
It seems another mod banned you so you can’t respond anymore, but I will say that this community is all about criticising comms and their rules as well. Just because you banned someone “according to rules” doesn’t mean it’s an action above criticism.
I came back to this thread days later just out of boredom to see what else happened.
Are you being intentionally obtuse? It seems pretty straightforward and you’re kinda just dismissing the very simple and obvious hypocrisy allegations with a weird strawman? Let me replay what is being discussed bcos I can’t tell if you’re being dumb on purpose or just misread something.
This is a community about (perceived) community mismanagement, based on common/majority opinion.
This community has a rule about disengagement. Seems like a fine rule to help keep things from escalating.
Goat’s community, allegedly, has the same rule. I am taking this at face value.
If this rule is enforced in Goat’s community, and then criticized in this community, then it is clearly, objectively, and I don’t know how else I can stress this ANY further, inarguably hypocritical to have a rule that operates on the same basis.
Again, I’m just taking what is being said by Goat at face value bcos you failed to actually refute anything they said and made a dumb argument about not needing to enforce Goat’s rules in other communities (which is clearly not what Goat was saying at all, hence why it’s so confusing that you got stuck on this strawman).
No goat just thinks his shit doesn’t stink, and if you deny it you’re a Tankie.