fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agohow do you slice it??mander.xyzimagemessage-square119fedilinkarrow-up11.03Karrow-down111cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1imagehow do you slice it??mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square119fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareLillyPip@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up109·2 months agoEveryone who’s dealt with kids knows you have to bisect the giraffe equally from nose to tail so everyone gets 2 legs, or somebody will cry that it’s unfair.
minus-squarepfwood178@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up103·2 months agoEveryone who deals with scientists knows they assume a perfectly spherical, frictionless, giraffe.
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·2 months agolol a giraffe would never fit in my vacuum.
minus-squarePaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 months agoYou have to remember to take the Elephant out first.
minus-squareColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoIf it’s frictionless, then a proper scientist already knows it’s in a perfect vacuum.
minus-squaremushroommunk@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoNot necessarily. Two objects can still have friction in a vacuum together.
minus-squareColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoThere was only half a giraffe. It didn’t say half a giraffe and some molecules.
minus-squareDaftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-22 months agoI cant remember, what is the friction coefficient for a giraffe?
minus-squaremushroommunk@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·2 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarebulwark@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29·2 months agoI let one cut and the other gets to pick first.
minus-square𝔄 𝔰𝔢𝔫𝔱𝔦𝔢𝔫𝔱 𝔭𝔦𝔢𝔠𝔢 𝔬𝔣 𝔠𝔥𝔢𝔢𝔰𝔢@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 months agoThis is the way. And from experience, it will result in sub-nanometer size differences.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoMake sure to get the same number of spots too.
minus-squarePart4@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoI think Samson made my luggage.
minus-squareshalafi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoThis is great! I feel I’m reading a drunk Brit who has some familiarity with the Bible, just a little. Oi! They’re both cunts!
Everyone who’s dealt with kids knows you have to bisect the giraffe equally from nose to tail so everyone gets 2 legs, or somebody will cry that it’s unfair.
Everyone who deals with scientists knows they assume a perfectly spherical, frictionless, giraffe.
In a vacuum
lol a giraffe would never fit in my vacuum.
You have to remember to take the Elephant out first.
That was a snake.
Git gud
If it’s frictionless, then a proper scientist already knows it’s in a perfect vacuum.
Not necessarily. Two objects can still have friction in a vacuum together.
There was only half a giraffe. It didn’t say half a giraffe and some molecules.
I cant remember, what is the friction coefficient for a giraffe?
deleted by creator
I let one cut and the other gets to pick first.
This is the way. And from experience, it will result in sub-nanometer size differences.
Kids are total commies.
Make sure to get the same number of spots too.
deleted by creator
I think you mean Solomon.
deleted by creator
I think Samson made my luggage.
deleted by creator
He didn’t personally build it.
Fewer
deleted by creator
This is great! I feel I’m reading a drunk Brit who has some familiarity with the Bible, just a little.
Oi! They’re both cunts!
deleted by creator