• AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      I found Deadpool & Wolverene supremely painful. Matter of taste I suppose. Haven’t seen any other dress-up movies in a while.

  • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Imo, the worst shit is the multiverse shit that makes it all meaningless. If they don’t like how they told the story, they will just make up a new version and say multiverse and you are the idiot for saying that it doesn’t make sense in another way because multiverse.

    An repetitive story with no meaningful content for the franchise and no interest in consistency.

    • floo@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Apparently, the new vision is to use the Multiverse explanation in order to bring all of the characters into one single timeline. So, apparently, Marvel has become quite aware of your issues, as the new studio head feels the same way. They’re doing what they can to address it, FWIW

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They’re doing a Battleworld, the comic event where Doom kidnaps Franklin Richards, and the molecule man, in order to temporarily erase the multiverse.

        The end of that particular comic storyline justified the end of the Ultimates universe, while allowing Miles Morales to join the main marvel universe.

        Nothing else changed. Because the first law of comics is that nothing ever changes. Not really.

        Movies on the other hand, have a problem. Actors age out of roles, so you should be changing the world with each movie… Marvel isn’t doing that.

        • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          justified the end of the Ultimates universe

          Ah, I really liked the ultimates universe because it did make a whole new start that I could jump into, compared to the decades of comics earlier. Plus they were pretty free about killing some characters off. I loved cyclops deciding to

          spoiler

          facemelt magneto

          because it felt like the characters had room to grow, fuck up, and change… like they could act in ways that didn’t need to preserve the status quo.

          • chaogomu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            It was a wonderful experiment. And it showed what you can do with tight continuity control… But it was a bit too grimdark. Heroes need to be allowed to act like heroes, even when it’s hard.

            The Ultimates universe felt like all the big names were slowly drifting towards evil.

            • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              I think my love for it came from the spiderman comic. Peter was great in the ultimate universe (and was the only comic I read through the entirety of). And yeah, grimdark is probably the right fit for it.

  • Nikls94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The last one I tried was Thor: love and thunder. I went out of the cinema 25 minutes in, didn’t get my money back. That movie was filled with forced jokes that made no sense.

  • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I’m trying to remember if Marvel likes the US military. Aren’t they always turning out to be secretly controlled by HYDRA or something? I also seem to recall that Iron Man decided he couldn’t trust them with weapons and invented his suit so that he could do all of his killing personally.

  • cute_noker@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Not to mention that every single movie has the same plot. But more meta each time

    • tazeycrazy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Wait. Wait. Wait. This one has a black guy as the protagonist. How about a woman. What if they are all alians. Or hear me out. All ultra wealthy?

  • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I don’t want to watch anything for three hours TBH. 95 minutes is the optimal run time for a film. FITE ME.

    • Farid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think 2h is optimal. Not too long, but can still fit a proper story with enough time for development.
      90 minutes is enough for children/family movies

      • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        Children/family movies can also have plenty of story and development. Case in point: Inside Out, runtime 1h 35m.

        • bstix@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          Inside Out is kinda forced through though. It ought to have been 2 hours.

      • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        This seems like a good time to mention that fucking Casablanca has a running time of 102 minutes. For most of the history of Hollywood 100-120 minute running times have been the norm.

        Gigantic runtimes are a feature of depression era economics, the 1930s and now.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I do personally enjoy a long film if it’s doing something good with the run time. Oppenheimer was a solid one recently, even with it being so long it was still densely-packed and I don’t think it would have been improved by being shortened. That said, I think two hours is roughly my default sweet spot. The further over that you go, the better you’re going to have to be to persuade me. I’m ready to be persuaded but it needs to be something

    • Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      Brutalist having an intermission was so nice and made me realize how much I’d love more movies to have this. Sadly I don’t think we’ll see this being done more as that little extra time probably cuts into the amount of showings you can do in a day.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I saw Interstellar in a classy New Zealand theater that gave creatively-cooked meals during an intermission. I feel like that would be a well-appreciated change of pace for a lot of people.

  • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    They really don’t like it when you don’t swoon over the latest new hot trending macguffin.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You’re right, but I can still fight you if you want, say we meet at the park near sundown?

        I’ll even let you get the first hit in, I’ll be walking around, and you can just run up and punch me.

        • porksnort@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          35 minutes ago

          Perfect, that is so fair. Please do not tell me which park or how to recognize you. It wouldn’t be sporting otherwise!