A debate is erupting around Islamic face coverings in Finland’s educational institutions.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250813123725/https://yle.fi/a/74-20177195


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

  • DeviantOvary@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Agreed, and this goes for any religion that does it. But what really grinds my gears about (other) leftists defending this kind of religious expression is, this isn’t something women choose. They’re forced to and groomed from young age to cover themselves. Meanwhile, their brothers, fathers, sons all walk around free to wear shorts, t-shirts, etc. If men had to cover themselves the same way, then sure, at least there would be some level of equality. This is just plain old misogyny that has no place in modern societies.

    However, with that said, there’s a real possibility banning head coverings would ultimately hurt girls, instead of helping them. Good education and financial independence and stability in adulthood would give these girls a better and safer way to escape. Like with any other societal problem, it’s complex and can’t be simply “magiced” away.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      But what really grinds my gears about (other) leftists defending this kind of religious expression is, this isn’t something women choose.

      How do you know that?

      They’re forced to and groomed from young age to cover themselves.

      That’s… kind of how all parenting works? You could legit say “they’re forced to and groomed from young age to X” and replace X with anything you want and it’ll work so you’re not really saying much.

      This is just plain old misogyny that has no place in modern societies.

      Yeah here’s the thing: Freedom of conscience means freedom of conscience, even when you don’t like that conscience. If misogyny is reason enough for you to take a sledgehammer to this core pillar of democratic society then go ahead, but know that fascists can use that same sledgehammer against whatever beliefs you have that they don’t like.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        How do you know that?

        Try wearing a headcovering for an entire day and I’m sure you’ll figure it out.

        Hijab, sure, easy. But a burka or a niqab? Nah, ain’t no-one choosing that without years of conditioning.

        You could legit say “they’re forced to and groomed from young age to X” and replace X with anything you want and it’ll work so you’re not really saying much.

        “They’re forced from a young age to respect differences and think for themselves and groomed not to behave in a way that limits the freedom of others.”

        Yeah, totally the same, isn’t it? /s

        “Taking a sledgehammer against a core pillar of a democratic society” what are you talking about? You think a code democratic principle is being broken here by limiting burkas and niqabs?

        Sure, buddy

        This you?