• mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    seems like this should go to court - make tesla prove these claims, and explain how they’re allowed to stifle both free speech and parody.

    because this is absolute bullshit

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Lol, Cybercucks getting what they deserve. Don’t drive a swasticar if you don’t want consequences. It was Tesla, this time. Next time, it could just be a citizen looking to enact a bit of justice.

    Inb4 douchebags defending their Tesla because they bought it “before Elon was crazy”. Your lack of awareness does not excuse your bad choices. Sell your Tesla.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      If car companies can’t remotely deactivate your vehicle, how will they be able to extort you and harass you and sell you out to the police?

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      This has been standard in every car made after 2003

      If your car is newer than that, the police can request the car company disable your engine.

      It’s fucked up and evil, but it isn’t new, just the first time it’s been blatantly abused

      • ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        You might be off by a couple of years there. And even if you aren’t, the 3G network those cars would’ve relied on for communications has been shut down so remotely doing anything to your 2004 car today would be impossible.

          • shininghero@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Not suitable for this.

            GPS is a purely one-way method, with the satellites transmitting only their position and a timecode, leaving the receiver to do the triangulation. And if they did send any sort of custom data packets over that method, it would just confuse the crap out of every other receiver across most of the world, causing potential device crashes, drawing attention from ham operators worldwide…

            And also massively pissing off the US military. Turns out a lot of their equipment and munitions make use of GPS and INS, so fucking with those satellites is a no-go.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 hours ago

    These guys are tender.

    We talk trash on european cars since ever. Brands and models alike. Nobody cares. And getting a car that was paid for blocked because someone feels the brand is being hurt would trigger a shit storm.

    When are you guys going to push Tesla to the bin?

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I don’t think the rapper was even criticizing them. I think he was literally singing their praises.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Cybertruck’s basically are in the bin. They have recalled them so many times and no longer have a sales campaign for them. Sure some get sold, but I bet fElon is giving a lot of them away to friends or sold under govt contract.

      The problem is that doesn’t really change stonk value. Tesla sells dreams and lies… cars just happen to be a useful byproduct.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They do though, so thats a total lie. Try getting into your car that you paid for firmware, see if tesla locks you down.

      I’ll note none of my old cars have this problem. Don’t buy new cars people.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Normally I would care that it’s a fake story but in this case I don’t mind spreading it. That guy needs to pay for what he has done to our country.

      • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        And I am ready to look the other way, because why should I care about Musk when he hates me? There are other priorities.

        Actually, I will begin by not even fact-checking the original post. That’s right. I will vibe-comment (I hope I’m using this at least somewhat right. I’m very old in internet years, I’m so sorry).

        • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          You know I might be just crazy enough to have even upvoted the original post.

          Seems unfair for only one side to have weaponized fake news

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Imagine:

    You have parking lots full of your cars that can’t sell because your CEO is basically in the top 5 of horrible humans.

    You have horror stories about kids burning alive in the cars because they couldn’t open the doors.

    You have a Rapper, with social following, in Detroit, Motor City, with a 100k model of your car who makes a song about how you’re fucking up, and you shut down his 100k car and send a c&d.

    Could you imagine a PR department being this bad at its job?

    He could make a music video burning the thing to the ground and make his money back.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That’s strange you don’t think the PR department takes its marching orders from their furher directly

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        22 hours ago

        No they just replaced it with a keyboard in a room full of cats with grok interpreting the random input.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          22 hours ago

          They would never care for a room of cats. They just put the keyboard under the front door mat.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I’m sure somebody is taking responsibility for it. You can’t do stupid shit and not have somebody else to fire.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Anyone who buys a fucking motor vehicle that comes with Terms and Conditions agreement, let alone one that can be spontaneously and remotely turned off… you’re a fucking moron. And Tesla needs to be sued into oblivion. That shit should NOT be legal.

  • Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    20 hours ago

    LOL registered previously in your name OR in your possession…

    So Tesla doesn’t even give a shit if the guy still owns the vehicle, they deactivated it because he owned it at one point in time.

    He could have sold it to some poor fuck who now has a bricked Cyber truck and Tesla don’t give a fuck.

  • qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    1 day ago

    Clippy moment 📎💬

    Unacceptable. It should be illegal to even build the capability to brick someone else’s property

    • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is a major feature of nearly all cars now. Dealerships can remotely track and disable cars when people fall behind on their payments. That’s because so many people fall behind on payments nowadays, they need easy mechanisms for dealing with it. America is cooked.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Got to love it. My crappy car doesn’t even have Bluetooth, but it does have a CD auto changer. Can’t brick my car.

    • MeThisGuy@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      same with the F-35s sold to other countries. and those cost a lot more than even a cybertruck. imagine it being disabled mid-flight. probably entirely possible.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I mean, that’s a tiny bit different. That’s something you want to be sure will never end up aiding a terrorist attack against you.

        Cybertrucks only kill people accidentally.

        • MeThisGuy@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          22 hours ago

          as far as I know (which is not a whole lot) terrorists only fly commercial planes. though I’m sure you can probably find the F-35 Handbook on the War Thunder forums.

          • NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            That’s the great thing: the government then get to decide who or what a terrorist is! - including oil rich middle East countries

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      So here’s the neat part! They just make it so that you technically are renting the car and so they can brick it up all they want since technically they own the vehicle!

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          They’ll pull the same crap they do with digital content you “buy.” Technically you’re just buying a license to use the vehicle, not actually buying the vehicle itself.

          • cole@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I don’t disagree, but in this case that is not true, because that is not what the terms and conditions say.

    • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Oi! Don’t bring clippy into this! He was an innocent clip from a better era! More like a [email protected] moment 👎🖕!!

      Edit: lol my poor clippy just getting hated on

      • qevlarr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I agree. I was referring to Louis Rossmann’s Clippy campaign that we should not accept this as consumers but we want technology to help us, like Clippy

        Edit: let’s not mass downvote for an innocent misunderstanding, even if they worded it a bit strongly. C’mon now

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Those monsters can’t downvite clippy, he’s being held captive against his will.

          Honestly, I kinda want to make a clippy bot, hook it into a self hosted LLM and have it roleplay as clippy trapped by Microsoft. It would be a hoot for 30 minutes or so.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Not absolutely, because a company being able to deactivate your purchased property for ulterior reasons is more dystopian.

      I also suspect the rapper wasn’t exactly praising the cybertruck, so that would add “for insulting misrepresenting? a company”. That’s even more dystopian.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        1 day ago

        You don’t have to suspect anything, watch the video. He’s hyping the Cybertruck, hyping, “I’m RICH BEEYOTCH!” This is Tesla trying to distance themselves from that message.

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          While that song and message are shit, so is Tesla.

          This is peak face eating leopards content all around.

          Also I wonder if a white rapper singing the same song would have had his shit-pyramid disabled as fast.

          Tesla factories have had a racism problem for years.

    • Taokan@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      45
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m just glad they got a power hungry, austistic lunatic in charge now, so everyone can see this is absolutely the end game, before this becomes normalized and people like me get called retarded for not wanting a car that can be remote deactivated.

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        112
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Autism doesn’t make someone an asshole. Let’s not normalise hatred of neurodivergence

        • s@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          The user also dropped the R slur. The “people like me” part stands out to me as a little suspect as well.

        • Genius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          I see no difference between calling him autistic and calling him narcissistic, except that one of those two mental disorders is one he claims to have a diagnosis for. Let’s fry the bigger fish first and then circle back to autism.

        • Senal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          It doesn’t but a neurodivergent person can absolutely be an arsehole.

          Its not a magic label that makes everything “quirky” and “eccentric”.

            • Senal@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              And i was correcting the misconception that just because someone is neurodivergent doesn’t make them immune to being an arsehole.

              Neurodivergent people are people, with all that entails.

                • Senal@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  Nobody said autism is bad (in the chain im replying to), but here we are.

                  Two statements that never happened with two corrections that aren’t needed apparently.

  • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is a good case to battle the shit out of Tesla in court and set a landmark verdict on the “you buy but don’t own” abuse.

    Usually this would however require that courts are capable of reaching proper verdicts, that the government actually cared about the people, that consumer protection agencies had any footing etc. Alas, all of them are infiltrated by the big capital corporations.

    • AlfredoJohn@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I mean, maybe it could work right now, considering how elmo and dump had a falling out. People might be able to leverage dumps pettiness to get a verdict on something like this. Now would be the time to try, though.

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I think this actually has a chance, but only because it affects millionaires. in any case the outcome would be very positive as it would apply elsewhere.