• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    The world is on fire, and the home country of these IPs is falling into a dictatorship. No one is stress watching movies, its not fun. Also, we’re broke and we’re about to sink into another recession.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      This is, IMHO, why Superman is doing so well. It’s the type of unapologetically wholesome shit I didn’t know my soul was so desperate for.

      EDIT: My wife just called it “hope porn” and I think it fits.

      • anon6789@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’ve been burnt out on superhero stuff for a bit, and had zero interest in checking out Superman as the DC stuff has been of no interest to me since the Nolan Batman movies.

        I put it on the other night for background noise, but it got my attention right from the start, and I really enjoyed it.

        The biggest thing for me was when he saved that squirrel mid-fight. The guy has everyone trying to kill him and the city, and he loves everything about Earth so much he can’t see any living thing suffer.

        There is so much unspoken collateral damage in all these action movies, and Superman wouldn’t even let a squirrel suffer for actions linked to him.

        I want someone to look out for me, dang it. Where’s our Superman?

        • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 days ago

          They tried to cut the squirrel scene after it tested badly but James kept it in because it’s so Superman

          • anon6789@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            5 days ago

            I just went back and watched the scene. The squirrel part is so quick compared to the other rescues like the dog in that same scene.

            The dog got a lot more direct attention, and that makes sense since a lot of people have or really like dogs. But I’ve never seen anything where the hero stops to save an animal nobody would ever even put in a scene.

            It wasn’t played up like a bit like the dog, and that made it feel like a more natural thing this Superman would do. It turned a throwaway gag into a bit of character development that in 3 seconds showed us this Superman would put himself on the line to save any life.

    • Newsteinleo@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 days ago

      It is a little hard to watch a movie where the hero saves the day from evil when you have a villain in the white house.

      • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, they might do good making a new punisher who saves the Whitehouse violently. Everyone loves an underdog revenge movie.

    • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      This is true. Sure they’re Marvel’s “First Family” but even before the MCU or any of the fox movies they were less popular than The Avengers, who were less popular than the X-men.

      Also, putting the movie up against Superman, who is DC’s #1 or #2 character, was a bad call.

      I thought the movie was great though.

      • angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        MCU used to be able to turn B- and C-list heroes into the biggest stars. I’m pretty sure Fantastic Four was more well known than Guardians of the Galaxy when that came out.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          But in a bad way, in this case FFs reputation works against it. Pretty much all the previous movies were panned.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Cannot get my head around this complaint. They don’t lock the doors at show time, so roll in 20-minutes late. That’s what we did for Superman. Caught a couple of trailers then the movie started.

            • shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Fine, be offended by the lie! No problem. But my point was that no one is forcing you to watch the ads and trailers.

                • shalafi@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Meh. You’re smart enough to figure the actual run time. Hating the lie is good enough! I just won’t ban theaters over it. Rare enough that we go anyway. Once a year at most? And even then, only for something that excites me.

            • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              I actually timed it at the last two movies I went to because I find that annoying too. It’s 18 minutes, including trailers (which I don’t mind) where I live.

              So I planned to show up 10 minutes after show time.

  • Sgtmoustache@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’ve always been a huge MCU fan. I was always day 1 in cinema to see the next movie. But with what is happening in the US, and all the threat the US have been making to my country (and the world), I don’t feel like buying and consumming any american product right now.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      1000%. There are quiet discussions on taxation of digital services here atm, I think adding a 20% import on movies parented by companis in America would bring the EU closer as our movies would be comparatively cheaper and the new revenues could go to grants for our own industry.

  • MimicJar@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 days ago

    Another thing not explored in this article is the 100 days to streaming rollout that we’ve seen.

    A film comes out, ~60 days later it hits Premium VOD, ~30 days later a physical release, shortly after it hits Disney+.

    A lot of people are willing to wait for a number of different reasons, economic, hype, quality, etc

    • ThunderComplex@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      For me it’s health related reasons. Even if I wanted to, I can’t go to a cinema to watch a movie.
      That’s why I don’t mind paying for premium VODs (that’s the closest I can get to real cinema) but it’s just cruel that in this COVID-era of ours films are still released cinema first with a huge delay until the digital release.
      Just let me watch it at home same day it releases for everyone else, I’m willing to pay for it.

      Bit off topic but I wanted to watch a YT video about James Bond and like 30 seconds in the guy launches into spoilers for the new Mission Impossible movie. Had to close that tab real fast like; shit like this could be prevented.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      I watched both and liked both as lot. Fantastic Four is probably the better movie. It’s more polished, more visually impressive, better story, etc. But I enjoyed Superman more.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      I do think they should have delayed Fantastic Four until at least mid August if not later. Maybe even save it for 2026.

      2023 had three MCU films, 2024 had just one MCU film, 2025 was back to three, 2026 will have just two. There was plenty of space for this film, to put it right after Superman was probably a mistake.

    • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Fantastic Four was way better, it’s not even close. The only thing that didn’t feel forced in Superman was the fight scenes.

      • Statick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I fell asleep during Fantastic Four. It was boring as hell.

        Didn’t see Superman though so I can’t compare it.

  • sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    I just saw FF tonight and I thought it was great. But I suspected interest must be off- I was in a cinema with only 12 other people.

  • 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    This drop-off tracks with the brand. I say this as someone who likes the F4, they just don’t have a broad appeal with general audiences that other comic brands have. They’re a property that only comic nerds care about and always have been.

    Edit: They also had to complete with Superman. The F4 have never been able to compete with Superman.

    • Pronell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m already two movies behind and yeah, I opted for Superman as well with zero regrets.

      I know I’ll see Fantastic Four on Disney+ eventually, and that’s Disney’s main problem.

    • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      This honestly is also how I feel. For decades I hear comic books fans rave about how great F4 is, but me being a tangential fan (only read DC growing up) I can name many of Marvel’s storylines from the comic books, but I can’t really name a storyline from the the Fantastic Four books. I know there’s something about a future foundation, but I never knew what it was.

      • 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Future Foundation is pretty much the definitive modern F4 story. Hickmens run as a whole is peak.

        A problem with the F4 is that their golden age of stories was back in the Silver Age of Comic Books. They were a cornerstone a lot of the early world-building of the Marvel Universe. Their lasting legacy has been the characters and ideas these stories introduced to the Marvel universe: Dr Doom, Galactus, The Silver Surfer, Black Panther, The Negative Zone, ect. Marvel has long struggled to adapt the team to the modern era.

        I haven’t seen the movie yet, but IMO the best F4 stories are ones where they aren’t so much a team of super heroes, but rather a team of scientist and explorers with super powers. They are better suited to telling sci-fi stories rather then traditional superhero stories.

        • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          I won’t say more as to not spoil it for you, but I think the movie does touch a lot on your last paragraph. I think general audiences are just not connecting to it for a number of reasons.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Interesting article. I’d say one fact it misses the importance of is that Fantastic Four is the 37th film in the MCU in 17 years. The MCU a huge sprawling and bloated mess, and it’s not surprising mainstream cinema goers have disengaged from it. That actually could hold a movie back - it’s not see as a “fantastic four” reboot, it’s seen as MCU installment 37 even if it tries not to be that.

    Add to that, 17 years is a long time. Frankly a lot of the original audience have “grown out” of watching these movies, and younger cinema goers are not watching MCU movies so they’re not replacing their audience. Plus streaming took off in that time and people who are now in their 30s and 40s are not going to the cinema anywhere near as much.

    For me, none of fhis is surprising. If anything I’m impressed they stayed at the top for as long as they did. But it had to end eventually - tastes change, people grow up and move on. Super Hero movies aren’t gone, but they’re not automatic mega hits anymore - things are just going back to “normal”. There isn’t anything much wrong with the MCU to fix, audiences just aren’t as interested in what it offers now.

    Marvel/Disney will keep making them just as they do with Star Wars because they’re in the business of franchises, but it’s beyond it’s peak and that’s pretty normal in entertainment. Nothing dominates forever.

    • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Basically, yeah, but with everything.

      Regurgitated rehashes of rehashes of rehashes. Ai slop has been our reality since before Ai slop. The only time I even get remotely surprised, it’s usually an indie thriller or horror film.

      It’s no wonder Invincible is popular. It’s no wonder Severance is popular. Yeah, they’re good, but they’re also fresh to the general public. They’re innately interesting and new.

      Marvel doesn’t do “interesting and new”. They’re a nostalgia factory.

    • breb@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      i think that they closed the first avengers phase too early. Specially iron man, i would like to see another iron man movie

      • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I would’ve liked to see more movies where they’re actually working as a team. All we got was the first half of Age of Ultron before the cracks appeared.

  • Soapbox@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    I just don’t enjoy going to a movie theater that much. I’ll watch it on Disney+ soon enough.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yup, digital releases are within 3 months, high seas within the next few hours. Nothing enticing about a movie theater anymore.

  • Zozano@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    My favourite part of the movie was when Thing got home and announced “Daddy needs to get his rocks off!”

      • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Yes. Then he yelled, “it’s sandblasting time!” The camera cut to a wall where a stream of sand was hitting it and it pooling on the floor.

        Of fucking course that wasn’t said. 🤦‍♂️

    • Tronn4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Now its to setup the following movies. Good or bad all these movies will be released

  • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    Can I say the casting really killed any little desire I had of watching it? The Bleached Woman and the Hu-meh Torch in particular. In that regard, the 2005 movie was spot-on, IMO.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      You know, a lot of people rag on Miller and the Flash movie, but VFX aside, they did a really good job establishing and playing 3 unique and distinct characters.